THE INFLUENCE OF TANGIBLE REWARDS TO STUDENT’S MOTIVATION IN 4TH GRADE SDN SINARGALIH 1 CIRANJANG STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v1i4.p350-356Abstract
This study focused on the influence of tangible rewards to students’ motivation on the learning process. The objective of this research is to describe how tangible reward can improve students’ motivation. This research used descriptive qualitative as a research design. The data of this research were obtained from interview to the teacher who teaches in 4th-grade students’ of SDN Sinargalih 1 Ciranjang. The interview was conducted twice. The result of the research would be described in the form of words. The result of the interview, the teacher had tried to apply tangible reward to improve students’ motivation. The teacher was quite good when used the tangible reward to improve the students’ motivation. Meanwhile, the result from teacher interview also showed that the students’ had better motivation from the first meeting to the next meeting. They tried to more active in the process of learning, although some of the students’ are still passive and had less of motivation. Then the result of an interview given to the teacher showed a positive effect. Tangible reward made the students participate actively. It is viewed by the students when the teacher gives some tests to get the reward. The students try to answer teacher question and had no fear to make mistakes.
References
Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating Students to Learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (3rd ed.). Los Angles: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harmer, J. (2001). The Practice of English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Longman.
Harmer, J. (2007). how to Teach English. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Komorowska, H. (1993). Qualitative vs quantitative on Fl teaching and learning process. Glottodidactica: An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, XXI(Qualitative vs quantitative on Fl teaching and learning process), 5–18.
Noels, K. A., Clement, R., & Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Intrinsic , Extrinsic , and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Leamers of English. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 3(Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Integrative Orientations of French Canadian Leamers of English), 424–442.
OECD. (2000). Motivating Students for Lifelong Learning. Paris: OECD Publications.
Slattery, M., & Willis, J. (2001). English for Primary Teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stix, A., & Hrbek, F. (2006). Teachers as Classroom Coaches. Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Su, Y. R. (2016). DEVELOPING JIGSAW MODEL FOR YOUNG LEARNERS ; PROMOTING MEANINGFUL AND AGE APPROPRIATE. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Missio, 8(DEVELOPING JIGSAW MODEL FOR YOUNG LEARNERS ; PROMOTING MEANINGFUL AND AGE APPROPRIATE), 93–103.
