PRESUPPOSITION OF PRESIDENT ERDOGAN’S MESSAGE IN HUMAN RIGHTS DAY ON DECEMBER 10, 2018

Communication will be impossible if everything had to be defined or explained every time we spoke. Whatever a speaker or writer assume that the receiver of the message already knows is called presupposition. This research analyzed about presupposition of message Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as President of The Republic of Turkey on Human Rights Day, December 10, 2018. The aims of this research are to find out the types of presupposition and identify the most dominant type of presupposition that used by Erdogan. Classification about types of presupposition by Yule (1996) as cited in Tryana & Satelah (2018) used in this research. The researchers analyzed the data with some steps applying the qualitative method, the researchers identifying the scripts of the speech, classifying the utterances into presupposition and categorizing them based on the types of presupposition. After that, counting the types of presupposition in percentage. As the result, The existential presupposition is the dominant type in Erdogan’s speech with the percentage 56,67% and followed by lexical and factive in the second and third position.


INTRODUCTION
Language is a primary tool for human to communicate in social life, because there is no society without communication. It is in line with opinion from KLM (2018), to communicate with others in their life, wether they talk, argue, or make opinion, people needs a system which called language. Based on Sukmawati, S & Wijayanto (2020), communication is the process of sending and receiving messages through verbal or nonverbal means, including speech, or oral communication; writing and graphical representation (such as infographics, maps, and charts); signs, signals, and behavior. Hybel & Weaver (2004) in Indah et.al (2018 in Viahapsari and Parmawati (2020) who defined communication as an interaction process between one person to another which aimed to the information and beliefs, swap ideas, making plan and solve the problem. In order to be successful in communication, all participants must understand what the context in their conversation because when the communication between two people or more or speakers and listeners take place, sometimes the speaker assumption is implicit and confusing. To understand the utterance of the speaker, the listener must consider with the context in which the speaker uses the utterances. The importance of understanding the context will be in the use of speech which has hidden meaning by the speakers (Astuti et al., 2019). For that reasons, to know the one what is communicated, but not said, we must to know about pragmatics and presupposition first. According to Tang (2019), presupposition is part of linguists from semantics and pragmatics perspective. Pragmatics is the study of language which addresses the true meaning of a word (Kuswandi & Apsari, 2019), while presupposition is something the speaker assumed to be case prior of making utterance (Yule, 1996) as cited in (Sukmawati, S & Wijayanto, 2020). In the other source, presupposition is like the truly background of the speaker's statement (Stalnaker, 1974) as cited in (Arkasa, 2019). Researcher can be conclude that presupposition is the information that speaker assumes to be already known but unsaid. This research investigated the presupposition in the speech of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Presidency of Republic Turkey about his message on Human Rights Day. The aim of this research is to find out the types of presupposition and and identify the dominant type of presupposition. The scope of the study of pragmatics is very broad so the writer limits it on presupposition types by Yule (1996) as cited in Tryana & Satelah (2018), namely: existential, factive, lexical, structural, non-factive , and counterfactual presuppositions. Whereas: (1) Existential presupposition is commited to the existence of the entities named or deliver something tha exist. For example, my mother has a new car. It means, my mother is exist and the car is exist.
(2) Factive presupposition, since some words/verbs/construction indicate that something is a fact. Sush as know, glade, realize, regret, odd, aware, and etc. For example, I'm glade its over. It means, that is truly over. (3) Lexical presupposition, when the speaker using one word can act as if another meaning will be understand, such as stop, start, again. For example, you are late again. It means, you were late before. (4) Structural presupposition. It is the assumption associated with the use of certain structures. Such as wh-forms can be used in this type. For example, where did you buy the book? It presupposes that speaker knows that "you" bought the book. (5) Non-factive presupposition. It is an assumption referred to something that is not true.
There are verb as a signal if that is not true, such as dreamed, imagine, etc. for example, they dreamed that they were rich. It means, they were not rich. (6) Counterfactual presupposition. It is the assumption that what is presupposed is not only untrue but is the opposite of what is true or contrary to facts. For example, if I were rich, I would buy a Ferrari. It presupposed that I am not rich and not buying Ferrari.

METHOD
This research employed qualitative descriptive method as the research methodology. In qualitative descriptive method, words or sentences more used rather than numbers to explain and describe of the case (Riana, et al., 2019). Based on Basrowi & Suwandi (2008) as cited in Astuti et al (2019), qualitative research data refers to the rich of words, pictures, figures. It means, the researcher analyzed the data descriptively and the presentation of the result was in a form of explanation of words which would be supported by the data presented.
By using this qualitative method, the researchers will explain and describe about Erdogan's presuppositions in his speech about the message on Human Rights Day on December 10 th , 2018. After collecting the data, the researchers analyzed the data with some steps applying the qualitative method, the researchers identifying the scripts of the speech, classifying the utterances into presupposition and categorizing them based on the types of presupposition. After that, counting the types of presupposition in percentage by using this formula: FK rel = FK X 100% ∑F

Results
The data analysis of presupposition were grouped based on the theory of Yule (1996) as cited in Tryana & Satelah (2018), in which the presupposition appeared from the presupposition triggers. The data were identified into presuppositions by underlining the triggers of presupposition in utterances. The presupposition in every utterance is written based on the triggers. Rights nowadays. After that, followed by lexical and factive in the second and third position.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Alhamdulillahi rabbil 'alamin, the researchers express the highest gratitude to Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala for love, blessing, opportunity, health, and mercy to complete this article. In arranging this article, a lot of people have provided motivation, advice, and support for the researchers. First, the deepest appreciation goes to beloved parents for always praying for the successful article also for financial support. Second, this aricle would not have been possible without the advice, support, and patience of my advisor, Mrs. Aseptiana Parmawati, M.Pd and all of lecturers. The last, researchers very grateful to some close friends who always give the support, help, and good listener for every problem in arranging this article.

Number of Presupposition
Percentage (