STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE USE OF VIDEO AS A MEDIUM OF LEARNING IN SPEAKING CLASS

Authors

  • Rika Soraya State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya
  • Sabarun Sabarun State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya
  • Aris Sugianto State Islamic Institute of Palangka Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i2.p372-384

Abstract

The study was aimed at knowing how students’ perceptions of the use of video as medium of learning in speaking class. Qualitative descriptive was utilized as a research method. The researcher selected 15 students of English Education IAIN Palangka Raya from 3 classes which were chosen 5 students in each class by using purposive sampling. To gain the data, the researcher used interview and documentation. The result showed the students’ perceptions of the use of video as a medium of learning in speaking class had good result.  Most students said the use of video as a medium of learning in speaking class was effective, flexible, and practice medium. It was also able to increase the students’ speaking skill which was called positive attitude. However, two students disagreed the use of video which was called negative attitude. They mentioned video was ineffective in increasing speaking fluency and not too challenging.

 

Keywords:  Students’ Perceptions, Video, Speaking Class

References

Azkiya, S. N., & Rahayu, R. (2018). Examining the Role of Video-Recorded Speaking Task in Enhancing Students’ Oral Productive Skill. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 5(2), 204–218.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. San Fransisco: Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language pedagogy. San Fransisco: State University.

Gromik, N. A. (2015). The Effect of Smartphone Video Camera as a Tool to Create Gigital Stories for English Learning Purposes. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 64–79.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburg: Pearson Education Ltd.

Indriani, S. (2020). Utilizing a recorded-video to assess speaking and presentation skills of pre-service teachers. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 10(1), 60–65.

Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A Blended Learning Study on Implementing Video Recorded Speaking Tasks in Task-Based Classroom Instruction. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 1–13.

Kulsiri, S. (2018). Students’ Perceptions of a Student-Produced Video Project in the General English Language Course at Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, (4), 40–54.

Masyi’ah, A. N. (2014). Improving the Speaking Ability of Grade VIII C Students of SMP Negeri 3 Depok Yogyakarta Through the use of Video. Thesis, State University of Yogyakarta.

Mortaji, L. El. (2018). University Students’ Perceptions of Videotaping as a Teaching Tool in a Public Speaking Course. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 14(8), 102.

Putri, R. N., & Rahmani, B. D. (2019). Students Perception on Using Video Recording to Improve Their Speaking Accuracy and Fluency. UHAMKA International Conference on ELT and CALL (UICELL), 113–122.

Sabarun. (2014). Using Brainstorming Technique in Writing Time- Order Paragraph At the Second Semester English Department Writing Paragraph Across the Different Level of Palangka Raya State Islamic College 2013/2014 Academic Years. Proc. 1st Natl. Conf. English Lang. Teach., Vol. ISSN: 2502, No. October 2014, 66–85.

Sabarun. (2018). Need analysis developing EFL, Paragraph writing materials at Kalimantan L2 Learners. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 186–193.

Sabarun. (2019). The influence of different types of feedbacks on learners’ writing performance at higher education. Proceedings of International Conference on English Language Teaching (INACELT), 3(1), 205–226.

Tafani, V. (2009). Teaching English through Mass Media. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 2(1), 81–95.

Tugrul, T. O. (2012). Student perceptions of an educational technology tool: Video recordings of project presentations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 133–140.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-07