Regulasi metakognitif untuk penguatan kompetensi profesional Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMP dalam pemanfaatan AI secara pedagogis dan etis

Regulasi metakognitif untuk penguatan kompetensi profesional Guru Bahasa Indonesia SMP dalam pemanfaatan AI secara pedagogis dan etis

Authors

  • Andoyo Sastromiharjo Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dadang S. Anshori Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Tofan Stofiana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Ahmad Fuadin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7344-3836
  • Eka Rahmat Fauzy Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Velayeti Nurfitriana Ansas Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Rahmad Nuthihar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/as.v9i3.33820

Keywords:

Kompetensi Profesional Guru, Metakognisi, Regulasi Metakognitif, Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia, Etika AI

Abstract

Penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI) generatif dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia memerlukan kemampuan guru menetapkan tujuan, memeriksa keluaran, dan mempertanggungjawabkan keputusan pedagogis. Kegiatan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ini bertujuan menggambarkan perubahan kompetensi terkait AI dan regulasi metakognitif pada 38 guru Bahasa Indonesia SMP yang mengikuti pelatihan bersama MGMP Kabupaten Cianjur di SMP Negeri 2 Cianjur pada 18–21 Juli 2026. Pelatihan memadukan materi kompetensi profesional, etika AI, serta latihan perencanaan, pemantauan, evaluasi dengan bantuan aplikasi Meta-AI Guru yang menyediakan jurnal metakognitif, Lab ChatGPT, dan fasilitas perancangan perangkat pembelajaran. Evaluasi menggunakan desain satu kelompok pretest–posttest (skala 0-100), rubrik praktik, dan angket respons. Rerata skor total meningkat dari 51,25 menjadi 69,15 (selisih 17,90 poin); seluruh 38 peserta meningkat pada skor total, meskipun peningkatan tidak merata pada setiap dimensi. Rerata N-gain individual sebesar 0,375 dan 86,8% peserta berada dalam kategori sedang. Kenaikan tertinggi terdapat pada evaluasi metakognitif (22,04 poin). Rerata skor praktik 70,18 dari 100 menunjukkan capaian tugas selama pelatihan. Hasil ini menggambarkan perubahan jangka pendek dalam konteks pelatihan, belum membuktikan keberlanjutan penerapan di kelas maupun pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar siswa.

References

Aguilar-Cruz, P. J., & Salas-Pilco, S. Z. (2025). Teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence in Colombia: AI technological access, AI teacher professional development and AI ethical awareness. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2025.2451865

Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468

Ding, A.-C. E., Shi, L., Yang, H., & Choi, I. (2024). Enhancing teacher AI literacy and integration through different types of cases in teacher professional development. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100178

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Fu, Y., & Weng, Z. (2024). Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in education: A systematic review on framing responsible human-centered AI practices. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100306

Gouseti, A., James, F., Fallin, L., & Burden, K. (2025). The ethics of using AI in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428601

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., Weller, J., Kuhn, J., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Li, B., Tan, Y. L., Wang, C., & Lowell, V. (2025). Two years of innovation: A systematic review of empirical generative AI research in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100445

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/ZJTE2084

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Prestridge, S., Fry, K., & Kim, E.-J. A. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs for Gen AI use in secondary school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428606

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26(1–2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003044231033

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Terttiaavini, T., Heryati, A., Cahyani, S., Putri, I. P., Saputra, T. S., & Lesfandra, L. (2025). Peningkatan kompetensi digital guru SMA melalui pelatihan pemanfaatan AI dan ChatGPT dalam pembelajaran interaktif. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(3), 1930–1940. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v6i3.13692

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times
Loading...