PENERAPAN METODE VAK (VISUAL, AUDITORI, KINESTETHIC) PADA PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS TEKS PUISI

Authors

  • Rosita Wulandari
  • Mia Sumiarsih
  • Rochmat Tri Sudrajat

Keywords:

VAK Method, Learning Writing, Poetry Text

Abstract

Language skills have four skills, namely listening, reading, writing and speaking. The students 'diverse abilities in material capture during the learning process, make educators have to be able to set methods that are suitable for students' abilities. In addition to the selection of methods, the lack of desire of students during poetry learning is due to a lack of vocabulary that makes it difficult for students to put their ideas into writing. By creating poetry texts students can actually help increase vocabulary and sensitivity. For this reason, through routine education and writing practice, it can help students increase their vocabulary. Writing poetry can be done according to students' varied abilities. With the VAK method (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) students can appreciate their poetry with the same understanding through their respective abilities. This study uses the pre-experimental design method. The pre-experimental design research design applied is a one-group pretest-posttest design. This design consists of one class to measure students' abilities before and after being given treatment. From the results of data analysis on the ability to write poetry texts from the scores of students' knowledge and skills in writing poetry, it was concluded that students of class X IT Development Vocational School were able to make poetry texts better by learning using the VAK method can be seen from the average results before using the VAK method (65.04) and the average after using the VAK method (77.36) which has been tested for normality, homogeneity, and significant differences

References

Ardila, R. R., Agustine, A., & Rosi, R. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Interferensi Bahasa Indonesia pada Anak Usia 12 Tahun Berdasarkan Perbedaan Latar Belakang Bahasa Orang Tua. Parole (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 1(4), 651-658.

Fatimah, F. N., Purnamasari, D., Pratiwi, D., & Firmansyah, D. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa pada Tuturan Pembawa Acara dan Bintang Tamu dalam Talk Show Hitam Putih yang Berjudul “Fenomena Kanjeng Dimasâ€. Parole (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 1(5), 775-786.

Fitrah, & Luthfiyah. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian. Sukabumi: CV Jejak.

Ismayani, R. M. (2017). Kreativitas dalam Pembelajaran Literasi Teks Sastra. Semantik, 2(2), 67-86.

Mustika, I. (2013). Mentradisikan Kesantunan Berbahasa: Upaya Membentuk Generasi Bangsa yang Berkarakter. Semantik, 2(1), 1-11.

Sudrajat, R. T., & Kasupardi, E. (2018). Teori Belajar Bahasa. Bandung: Logoz Publishing.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumiati, & Asra. (2008). Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: Wacana Prima.

Trianto. (2012). Mendesain Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana.

Nugraha, E., Wawan, W., & San Fauziya, D. (2018). Pengaruh Penggunaan Bahasa Sunda Terhadap Penggunaan Bahasa Indonesia pada Masyarakat Kampung Balandongan Kabupaten Bandung Barat. Parole (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia), 1(3), 425-434.

Wikanengsih, W. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Neurolinguistic Programming Berorientasi Karakter Bagi Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 19(2).

Winarni, & Retno. (2010). Kajian Sastra. Salatiga: Widya Sari.

Zainurrahman. (2013). Menulis. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-13