The Implementation of Teachers' Indirect Feedback on Students' Writing Performance in Descriptive Text
Abstract
This study aims to describe the implementation of teachers’ indirect feedback on students’ descriptive writing skills and to examine how this feedback contributes to improving their grammatical accuracy. The research was conducted at one of the state junior high schools in Karawang Regency, Indonesia, involving seventh-grade students as participants. A qualitative approach with a case study design was employed to allow an in-depth exploration of the feedback process within a real classroom context. Data were collected through classroom observations, interviews, and analysis of students’ writing drafts before and after the application of indirect feedback. The findings revealed that the use of indirect feedback effectively helped students identify and correct grammatical errors, particularly in areas such as subject-verb agreement, verb tense, and word choice. As a result, students demonstrated noticeable improvement in their overall writing quality and grammatical accuracy. Moreover, the students expressed positive attitudes toward this feedback technique, stating that it motivated them to revise their work and encouraged greater independence in learning. The novelty of this study lies in its focus on implementing indirect feedback in junior high school settings, especially in teaching descriptive texts, which remains an underexplored area in Indonesian EFL contexts.
References
Aridah, A., & Iswari, W. P. (2021). The effect of indirect feedback on students’ writing performance across different learning strategies. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. Retrieved from ERIC.
Bekele, T., Seyoum, G., & Tibebu, A. (2022). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect feedback on students’ writing performance. East African Journal.
Dehqan, M., & Bay, Z. H. (2019). The effects of gradual and indirect feedback on EFL learners’ grammar development and beliefs. Teaching English as a Second Language.
Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019). Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective? Language Awareness, 28(2), 99–117.
Garofolini, A., Oppici, L., & Taylor, S. (2020). A real-time feedback method to reduce loading rate during running: Effect of combining direct and indirect feedback. Journal of Sports Sciences, 38(12), 1433–1440.
Harianti, H. (2023). The effect of using teachers’ indirect feedback on students’ writing skills. [Unpublished manuscript].
Kim, Y. J., Choi, B., Kang, S., & Kim, B. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 348–370.
Kusumastuti, A., Rodchom, P., Intolo, W., & Phusavat, K. (2025). Roles of indirect feedback and attitude for sustainability in learning. Sustainability, 17(1), 23.
Mafulah, S., & Basthomi, Y. (2022). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on students’ writing quality. In Proceedings of the Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT.
Melly, S., Listyani, L., & Sumakul, T. Y. G. (2024). Students’ perceptions of direct and indirect feedback in speaking for social purposes. Satya Widya, 40(1), 23–32.
Mido, L. (n.d.). The effect of teacher indirect feedback on students’ writing performance. [Unpublished manuscript].
Nusrat, A., Ashraf, F., & Ahmad, N. (2019). Effect of direct and indirect teacher feedback on accuracy of English writing: A quasi-experimental study among Pakistani undergraduate students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4), 55–71.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (3rd ed.). Pearson Longman.
Reinoso, J. V. (2023). A systematic literature review: Direct and indirect feedback strategies in EFL contexts. rEFLections, 30(1), 45–61.
Shahab, M. L., & Saeed, K. M. (2024). Direct and indirect written corrective feedback: Lecturers’ perspectives. The Qualitative Report, 29(2), 456–468.
Sugianto, A., & Elhawwa, T. (2020). The effectiveness of direct and indirect feedback on learners’ writing performance across different genders and cultural backgrounds. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12), 1830–1837.
Uzun, K., & Köksal, H. (2020). Direct vs indirect written corrective feedback: An action research. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 10(2), 470–484.
Yao, Q. (2019). Direct and indirect feedback: How do they impact secondary school learners’ writing anxiety, and how do learners perceive them? The Asian EFL Journal, 21(2), 87–109.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 1021 times









