Fillers in EFL Students’ Spoken Analytical Exposition at SMA Negeri 3 Semarang
Abstract
Speaking fluency is one of challenges for EFL students, particularly in spontaneous spoken. To address these challenges, students often employ fillers as communicative strategies. This research aims to explore the types and functions of fillers applied by EFL students in short spoken analytical exposition at SMA Negeri 3 Semarang. This research applied a qualitative approach with limited frequency counts. The data consists of 30 video recordings of speaking performances produced by 60 eleventh-grade students and were transcribed verbatim. The fillers’ types were classified according to Rose (1998), while their functions were analyzed using Stenstrom’s (1994) framework. The findings revealed a total of 91 fillers, with unlexicalized fillers being the most dominant. This dominance indicates students’ preference for immediate and low-effort strategies when facing linguistic constraints during spontaneous speech. Furthermore, the fillers served five communicative functions: hesitation devices, time-creating devices, empathizing devices, mitigating devices, and editing terms. These results confirm that fillers functioned as strategic resources in spoken language rather than as indicators of low proficiency. Fillers play a significant role in supporting EFL students’ fluency, discourse management, and interactional competence. Therefore, this study suggests that fillers should be pedagogically recognized and integrated into speaking instruction to enhance students’ communicative strategies.
References
Awang, S., Wan Hassan, W. N. F., Abdullah, N., & Mohd Zawawi, M. Z. (2022). Use of Fillers as a Communication Strategy in Oral Interactions. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i7/14330
Creswell, & Poth. (2018). 761189756-Creswell-and-Poth-2018-Qualitative-Inquiry-4th-Mr-Phi-s-e-Library-Page-1-646-Flip-PDF-Online-PubHTML5.
Gandeza, C. C. (2023). Language Fillers Used by Students in Conversation. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 4(2), 485–501.
Hardianti, R. (2016). A Study of EFL Students’ Oral Communication Strategies in Discussions. Indonesian EFL Journal, 2(1), 23–33.
Hassan, W. N. F. W., Awang, S., & Abdullah, N. (2021). Fillers as Communication Strategies Among English Second Language Speakers in Job Interviews. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n1p30
Islam, W., Ahmad, S., & Islam, M. D. (2022). Investigating the Problems Faced by the University EFL Learners in Speaking English Language. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22223
Kalisa, P. (2019). Communication Strategies in English Second Language Acquisition. In LANGUAGE CIRCLE: Journal of Language and Literature (Vol. 14, Number 1). http://journal.unnes.ac.id
Mukminin, A., & Arif, N. (2015). EFL Speaking Anxiety among Senior High School Students and Policy Recommendations. In Journal of Education and Learning (Vol. 9, Number 3).
Pawlak, M. (2018). Investigating the use of speaking strategies in the performance of two communicative tasks: The importance of communicative goal. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2 Special Issue), 269–291. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.5
Vrika, & Diananseri. (2022). The Use of Fillers in The Casual Conversation.
Rahmawati, Y., & Farida, A. N. (2025a). Fillers in Finals of National School Debating Championships. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i1.603
Rahmawati, Y., & Farida, A. N. (2025b). Fillers in Finals of National School Debating Championships. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i1.603
Riadil, I. G. (2020). JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics Volume 2 Number 2 EFL Students in Speaking Skill: Identifying English Education Students’ Perceptions Ofpsychological Problems in Speaking.
Rini, I. W., Arifin, Z., & Susilawati, E. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using Discussion Task in Teaching Speaking of Analytical Exposition Text.
Rose, R. L. (1998). The Communicative Value of Filled Paused in Spontaneous Speech.
Sayuri, S. (2016). Problems in Speaking Faced By EFL Students of Mulawarman University. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefll.v1i1.4
Syamsudin. (2015). The Use of Fillers As A Speaking-problem Solving in EFL Learners’ Speaking Class.
Syamsudin, Istiadah, Syafiyah, Cahyono, A. E., & Mulyono, S. (2024). Utilizing fillers for addressing speaking challenges, improving self-confidence and motivation in EFL learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(4), 1327–1334. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21629
Tajik, O., Golzar, J., & Noor, S. (2024). | P a g e Purposive Sampling. In IJELS (Number 2).
Taslim, F., & Hervina, H. (2021). Communication Strategies in Classroom Discussion of Graduate Students. Modality Journal: International Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 1(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.30983/mj.v1i1.5126
Wahyuningsih, S., & Afandi, M. (2020). Investigating English speaking problems: Implications for speaking curriculum development in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 967–977. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.3.967
Yulpia, T. (2025). The Use of Fillers by the Students of English Study Program in English Speaking Practice. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah, 3(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.69743/edumedia.v3i1.42
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 871 times


