WORKING AND NON-WORKING STATUS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS' LANGUAGE LEARNING STRATEGIES

Asti Gumartifa(1*), Indawan Syahri(2)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Study while working has several effects in advanced higher education. Working and studying at the same time in university can be as reward and stressful. Thus, language learning strategies for working students and non-working students play an important role in the effectiveness and efficiency of English language learning. The researchers examined whether or not there is significant differences of English language learning strategies used by working and non-working students. Quantitative descriptive study was used to describe the findings. The result showed that working students applied memory strategies dominantly. The number average mean score of memory strategy was 4.02 in the category of high, where compensation learning strategies was 2.77 that categorized the lowest mean average. Non-working students applied all learning strategies at the medium level category. The highest number of mean average of language learning strategies was cognitive strategies with the average mean was 3.11. Total number mean average of metacognitive and affective strategies was the same 2.79. Compensation, memory, and social strategy were also in the medium category with different total numbers average. The mean average of compensation strategies was 3.01, memory strategy was 2.93, and social strategy was 2.75.

 

Keywords:  English Language, Learning Strategy, Status, Category, Undergraduate


Full Text:

PDF

References


Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

Biggs, J. (2014). Teaching for Quality Learning at University Assessing for learning quality : II . Practice.

Brown. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Institude for Inquiry, 18(1), 32–42.

Cohen, J. (2011). Second-language Literacy Instruction: Five Principles for Effective Fluency Development. The Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles, 54, 59–68.

Curtis, & N, S. (2002). The Effect of Taking Paid Employement During Term-time on Students’ Academic Studies. Journal of Future and Higher Education, 26(2), 129–138.

Deneme. (2008). Language Learning Strategies Preferences of Turkish Students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Students, 4(2).

Ding, Y. (2007). Text memorization and imitation: the practices of successful Chinese learners of English, System. Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 35, 271–280.

Faizuddin, A., Mansir, F., Purnomo, H., & Aisyah, N. (2020). Working Students in Higher Education : Challenges and Solutions. Jurnal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 78–89.

Goodyear, V., & Dudley, D. (2015). “ I ’ m a Facilitator of Learning !” Understanding What Teachers and Students Do Within Student-Centered Physical Education Models. Quest, (67), 274–289.

Guile, D., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Learning through work experience. Journal of Education and Work, 1–16.

Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Study strategies of college students : Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement ? Psychonomic Society, pp. 126–134.

Kanlisi, S. (2016). The Effect of Student Learning Strategies on Performance and Carrier The Effect of Student Learning Strategies on Performance and Carrier Development : The Case of University for Development Studies. Education Journal, 5(6), 172–182.

Maquiling, A. (2018). Working Students : Their Benefits , Challenges and Coping Mechanisms. Social Science and Humanities Journal, 2(3), 358–369.

Mokhtar, A. A. (2012). Guessing Word Meaning from Context Has Its Limit : Why ? International Journal of Linguistic, 4(2), 288–305.

Munawaroh. (2017). The Influence of Teaching Methods and Learning Environment to the Student ’ s Learning Achievement of Craft and Entrepreneurship Subjects at Vocational High School. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(4), 665–678.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Rubin, J., & Thompson, I. (1982). How to be a more successful language learner. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Sampelolo, R., & Atmawardoyo, H. (2016). Learning Strategies and Styles of a Part Time Job Student With Good Achievement ( A Case Study of a Successful Part Time Job EFL Learner ). ELT Worldwide, 3(1), 91–106.

Simsek, A., & Balaban, J. (2010). Learning Strategies of Successful and Unsuccessful University Students. Contemporary Educational Technology, 1(1), 36–45.

Stevenson, A., & Harper, S. (2016). Workplace stress and the student Workplace stress learning experience. 167–178.

Vygotsky, S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weinstein. (1987). Fostering learning autonomy through the use of learning strategies. Journal of Reading, 30(7), 590–595.

Wenden. (1991). Metacognitive strategies in L2 Writing: A Case for Task knowledge. In Rountable on Language and Linguistics (pp. 302–321). George University.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/project.v5i4.p891-897

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 36 times
PDF - 6 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


p-ISSN: 2614-6320

e-ISSN: 2614-6258

 Project by https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/project/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License.


View My Stats