This study aims to examine Bing AI (also known as Bing Chat or Copilot) as a feedback agent, focusing on responses to predetermined prompts related to the content score of a research abstract. Two prompts were systematically input, resulting in extended non-corrective feedback from Bing AI which was sensitive to the prompt wording. This study was motivated by challenges in EFL writing feedback provision. Difficulties that teachers face, limitations of peer feedback, and potential drawbacks of Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tools were briefly discussed. The results indicate that Bing AI is a promising feedback agent, offering insights into overcoming challenges in feedback provision, specifically in EFL writing instruction. The limitations of the study are also briefly discussed, as well as recommendations for future studies.

Author Biography

Zainurrahman Zainurrahman, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Currently, I am a lecturer of a private college in Ternate who is pursuing a doctoral degree in Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.


Abdul Rahman, N. A., Zulkornain, L. H., & Hamzah, N. H. (2022). Exploring Artificial Intelligence using Automated Writing Evaluation for Writing Skills. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 7(SI9), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v7iSI9.4304

Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., Lara, M. M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2022). What influences students’ peer-feedback uptake? Relations between error tolerance, feedback tolerance, writing self-efficacy, perceived language skills and peer-feedback processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 97, 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102175

Banister, C. (2023). Exploring peer feedback processes and peer feedback meta-dialogues with learners of academic and business English. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 746–764. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820952222

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bolourchi, A., & Soleimani, M. (2021). The Impact of Peer Feedback on EFL Learners’ Writing Performance and Writing Anxiety. International Journal of Research in English Education, 6(1), 1–15.

Camarata, T., & Slieman, T. A. (2020). Improving Student Feedback Quality: A Simple Model Using Peer Review and Feedback Rubrics. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 238212052093660. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120520936604

Dodigovic, M., & Tovmasyan, A. (2021). Automated Writing Evaluation: The Accuracy of Grammarly’s Feedback on Form. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 3(2), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2021.06.06

Eliaçık, E. (2023, February 8). Microsoft’s ChatGPT-powered Bing is available for preview. DataConomy. https://dataconomy.com/2023/02/08/new-microsoft-bing-ai-waitlist-chatgpt-bard/

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “Grammar Correction” Debate in L2 Writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime …?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

Gao, J. (2021). Exploring the Feedback Quality of an Automated Writing Evaluation System Pigai. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 16(11), 322. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i11.19657

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

John, P., & Woll, N. (2020). Using Grammar Checkers in an ESL Context: An Investigation of Automatic Corrective Feedback. CALICO Journal, 37(2), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.36523

Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022). Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review, a Meta-Analysis, and a Preliminary Feedback Intervention Theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.

Koltovskaia, S. (2023). Postsecondary L2 writing teachers’ use and perceptions of Grammarly as a complement to their feedback. ReCALL, 35(3), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000179

Mehdi, Y. (2023, February 7). Reinventing search with a new AI-powered Microsoft Bing and Edge, your copilot for the web [Official Microsoft Blog]. Microsoft. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/02/07/reinventing-search-with-a-new-ai-powered-microsoft-bing-and-edge-your-copilot-for-the-web/

Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050

Mohebbi, H. (2021). 25 years on, the written error correction debate continues: An interview with John Truscott. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 6(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-021-00110-9

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Grammarly: Help or hindrance? Academic Learning Advisors’ Perceptions of an Online Grammar Checker. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 13(1), 88–107.

Palermo, C., & Wilson, J. (2020). Implementing Automated Writing Evaluation in Different Instructional Contexts: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Writing Research, 12(1), 63–108. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.12.01.04

Schmidt-Fajlik, R. (2023). ChatGPT as a Grammar Checker for Japanese English Language Learners: A Comparison with Grammarly and ProWritingAid. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 14(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.231417

Shi, Y. (2021). Exploring Learner Engagement with Multiple Sources of Feedback on L2 Writing Across Genres. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758867

Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe? LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256.

Sweeney, S. (2023). Who wrote this? Essay mills and assessment – Considerations regarding contract cheating and AI in higher education. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100818

Tai, A. M. Y., Meyer, M., Varidel, M., Prodan, A., Vogel, M., Iorfino, F., & Krausz, R. M. (2023). Exploring the potential and limitations of ChatGPT for academic peer-reviewed writing: Addressing linguistic injustice and ethical concerns. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 17(1), 16–30.

Tajabadi, A., Ahmadian, M., Dowlatabadi, H., & Yazdani, H. (2023). EFL learners’ peer negotiated feedback, revision outcomes, and short-term writing development: The effect of patterns of interaction. Language Teaching Research, 27(3), 689–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820951207

Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102247

Truscott, J. (1996). The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1996.tb01238.x

Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of english as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101071

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing Writing. Cambridge University Press.

Yu, S. (2021). Feedback-giving practice for L2 writing teachers: Friend or foe? Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100798

Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Jiang, L., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2021). “I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing. Assessing Writing, 48, 100528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100528

Zinkevich, N. A., & Ledeneva, T. V. (2021). Using Grammarly to Enhance Students’ Academic Writing Skills. Professional Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-51-63