Larasati Nur Yuliawati, Bambang Harmanto, Diyah Atiek Mustikawati, Ana Maghfiroh


WCF from the lecturer is useful information for student writing improvement. It aids students in identifying their English learning problems and skills. Students, on the other hand, may interpret lecturer WCF differently than the lecturer intended. This study is aimed at describing the type of lecturer’s WCF and the students’ perception of lecturer’s WCF in a paragraph writing class. It is descriptive qualitative research, employing documentation and interview as research instruments, which was conducted with 18 students of the third semester English department students of Muhammadiyah University of Ponorogo. Furthermore, there were five out of 18 students randomly selected to be interviewed to discover students’ perspective of the given feedback. The findings revealed that, firstly, the lecturer use praise, criticism, and suggestion based on students task in paragraph writing class. Secondly, students’ positive responses of having feedback and the benefit of written corrective feedback that students get. Finally, most students responded that they appreciated the lecturer’s WCF. In addition, the students believed that lecturer’s WCF could improve student’s writing especially on grammar accuracy and organization, and it could motivate the student in developing the ideas.


Keywords:  Student’s Perspective, Written Corrective Feedback, Writing

Full Text:



Anggraini, D. (2018). students' perspective toward teacher's written corrective feedback on students' writing in paragraph writing class. Universitas Jambi.

Amara, T. M. (2015). Learners’ perceptions of teacher written feedback commentary in an ESL writing classroom. International Journal of English language teaching, 3(2), 38-53.

Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why?. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127.

Astuti, W., Maghfiroh, A., & Palupi, R. E. A. (2020). Enhancing Students’writing Ability By Implementing Problem-Based Learning Method At The English Department Students In Muhammadiyah University Of Ponorogo In Academic Year 2019/2020. EDUPEDIA, 4(2), 155-161.

Aulia, A. M. (2018). The Lecturers Written Corrective Feedback Practices In Essay Writing Class At English Department Of Iain Tulungagung.

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of second language writing, 14(3), 191-205.

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language teaching research, 12(3), 409-431.

Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of second language writing, 12(3), 267-296.

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here?(and what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of second language writing, 13(1), 49-62.

Gamlem, S. M., & Smith, K. (2013). Student perceptions of classroom feedback. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(2), 150-169.

Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2000). Student guide to accompany educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. Merill.

Hamouda, A. (2011). A Study of Students and Teachers' Preferences and Attitudes towards Correction of Classroom Written Errors in Saudi EFL Context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128-141.

Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English language teaching 4th edition. Harlow: England Pearson Education.

Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 185-212.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues, 1-19.

Jeremy, H. (2004). How to teach writing. Essex: Pearson Longman.

Karimi, S. H. (2016). Effects of Different Types of Teacher WCF on Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 216-229.

Kisnanto, Y. P. (2016). The effect of written corrective feedback on higher education students' writing accuracy. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra UPI, 16(2), 121-131.

Lindqvist, A. (2017). The Use of WCF: A Survey of Written Response from Teachers to ESL Students in English A- Course Upper School

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in second language acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

Mahfoodh, O. H. A., & Pandian, A. (2011). A Qualitative Case Study of EFL Students' Affective Reactions to and Perceptions of Their Teachers' Written Feedback. English Language Tea