Students’ voices on academic writing in higher education: Needs, preferences, and digital integration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jpp.v5i1.31133Keywords:
Academic writing, Challenges, Digital integration, Higher education, Students’ VoicesAbstract
Academic writing is a crucial skill for students in higher education; however, it remains a significant challenge, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts. Limited research has foregrounded students’ voices regarding their academic writing needs, learning preferences, and the role of digital tools in supporting their writing development. Addressing this gap, the present study aims to explore students’ perceptions of their academic writing needs, investigate their preferred ways of learning academic writing, and examine their perceptions of the role of digital tools in facilitating and supporting their writing processes. This study employed a descriptive qualitative design to investigate students’ experiences and perceptions of academic writing. Data were collected through a survey involving 82 university students and in-depth interviews with six selected participants. The collected data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings show that students struggle with writing coherent paragraphs and structuring arguments. To overcome these challenges, they prefer a combination of structured scaffolding and digital collaborative learning. Regarding digital tools, research databases and writing platforms were the most commonly used, with Google Scholar used for reference searching and Grammarly for writing support. Moreover, students preferred interactive media, particularly educational videos, digital mind-mapping tools, and interactive quizzes. These findings suggest that integrating structured instruction, collaboration, and interactive digital tools can improve students’ engagement and academic writing skills.
References
Alotaibi, F. A. A., Johnson, F., & Rowley, J. (2022). Google Scholar or university digital libraries: A comparison of student perceptions and intention to use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221111197
Aunurrahman, A., Hamied, F. A. H., & Emilia, E. (2017). Exploring the tertiary EFL students’ academic writing competencies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.6860
Aunurrahman, A., Hamied, F. A., & Emilia, E. (2016). Exploring an academic writing class in an Indonesian university context. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v11i1.7842
Bacha, N. (2000). Academic writing in a multilingual context: A study of learner difficulties. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 1(2), 239–268.
Bloch, J. (2007). Abdullah’s blogging: A generation 1.5 student enters the blogosphere. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 128–141.
Bram, B., & Angelina, P. (2022). Indonesian tertiary education students’ academic writing setbacks and solutions. International Journal of Language Education, 6(3), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i3.22043
Camacho, M. (2016). David Kelley: From design to design thinking at Stanford and IDEO. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 2(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.009
Castañeda, M. E. (2013). “I am proud that I did it and it’s a piece of me”: Digital storytelling in the foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal, 30(1), 44–62.
Chelghoum, A., & Grine, N. (2018). Developing EFL learners’ academic writing through collaborative writing projects. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.504255
Cimasko, T., & Shin, D. S. (2017). Multimodal resemiotization and authorial agency in an L2 writing classroom. Written Communication, 34(4), 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088317727246
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Early, M., Kendrick, M., & Potts, D. (2015). Multimodality: Out from the margins of English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 49(3), 447–460. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43893767
Faridah, D., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2018). Exploring academic writing needs of Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.31
Hafner, C. A. (2013). Digital composition in a second or foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 830–834. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.135
Hafner, C. A. (2014). Embedding digital literacies in English language teaching: Students’ digital video projects as multimodal ensembles. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.138
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86.
Hafner, C. A., & Miller, L. (2019). English in the disciplines: A multidimensional model for ESP course design. Routledge.
Hatt, L., Davidson, J., & Carrion-Weiss, J. (2023). Design thinking as pedagogy in practice. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 10(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.102.23-013
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
Jiang, L., & Luk, J. (2016). Multimodal composing as a learning activity in English classrooms: Inquiring into the sources of its motivational capacity. System, 59, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.04.001
Kern, R., & Schultz, J. M. (2005). Beyond orality: Investigating literacy and the literary in second and foreign language instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00312.x
Kim, Y., Belcher, D., & Peyton, C. (2023). Comparing monomodal traditional writing and digital multimodal composing in EAP classrooms: Linguistic performance and writing development. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, Article 101247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101247
Kotamjani, S. S., Mustapha, R., & Zulkifli, C. Z. C. (2018). Exploring postgraduate students’ perceptions of difficulties in thesis writing. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(4), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v7-i4/5052
Kurniawan, E. (2023). Rhetorical structure of abstracts in applied linguistics: A move analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1), 395–413. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.27743
Kurniawan, E., Lubis, I., & Susanto, S. (2019). Move analysis of abstracts in Indonesian and English research articles: A comparative study. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20216
Kusmanto, H., Zamzani, Z., & Suryaman, M. (2024). Unleashing the secrets of academic writing: Exploring Indonesian language courses in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(4), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21662
Lee, S. C. N., & Tajino, A. (2008). Understanding students’ perceptions of difficulty with academic writing for teacher development: A case study of the University of Tokyo writing program. Kyoto University Researches in Higher Education, 14, 1–11. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/70833
Lesmana, N., & Ariffin, K. (2020). Problems in writing scholarly articles in English among Indonesian EFL postgraduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(4), 12–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v9-i4/8174
Liang, W. J., & Lim, F. V. (2020). A pedagogical framework for digital multimodal composing in the English language classroom. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 15(4), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1800709
Limbong, M., F., F., Harefa, N., & Lumbantoruan, J. H. (2022). Description of increasing the number of research and publication of lecturers at the Indonesian Christian University, East Jakarta. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v6i2.5374
Lubis, I., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). Rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. Humaniora, 32(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.v32i1.57703
Mansourizadeh, K., & Ahmad, U. K. (2011). Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.005
Marshall, J. C. (2013). Succeeding with inquiry in science and math classrooms. ASCD.
Mukminin, A., Ali, R. M., & Ashari, M. J. F. (2015). Voices from within: Student teachers’ experiences in English academic writing socialization at one Indonesian teacher training program. The Qualitative Report, 20(9).
Nabilla, A., Kurniawan, E., & Fitriani, S. S. (2021). Move analysis of research article introductions in applied linguistics. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.19143
Nugrahini, Y., & Rakhmawati, I. (2022). The effect of extensive reading on EFL learners’ writing performance. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(2), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i2.3073
Peacock, M. (2011). The structure of the methods section in research articles across eight disciplines. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 99–124.
Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(4), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.08.004
Pham, Q. N., & Li, M. (2023). Digital multimodal composing using Visme: EFL students’ perspectives. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32(5), 695–706.
Pham, V. P. H. (2023). The impacts of collaborative writing on individual writing skills. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(4), 1221–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-09939-2
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
Putri, R. K., Junipriansa, D., & Sutjipto, M. R. (2023). Research culture in improving the performance of higher education scientific publications. International Journal of Economics, Business, and Management Research, 7(7), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2023.7711
Ramadhan, R. A., Rahim, A., Darmanto, D., & Paris, A. S. (2024). Enhancing academic writing through digital tools: A systematic review. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(4), 707–770. https://doi.org/10.36312/jolls.v4i4.2342
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Sağlamel, H., & Kayaoğlu, M. (2015). English major students’ perceptions of academic writing: A struggle between writing to learn and learning to write. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v4i3.477
Shayakhmetova, L., Mukharlyamova, L., Zhussupova, R., & Beisembayeva, Z. (2020). Developing collaborative academic writing skills in English in CALL classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(8), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p13
Shin, D. S., & Cimasko, T. (2008). Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition, 25(4), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2008.07.001
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Warschauer, M. (2009). Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In M. Baynham & M. Prinsloo (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 123–140). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245693_7
Xu, Y. (2023). Investigating the effects of digital multimodal composing on Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance: A quasi-experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(4), 785–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1945635
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from introduction to results. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Yang, Y. F. D. (2012). Multimodal composing in digital storytelling. Computers and Composition, 29(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2012.07.001
Yasin, M., & Qamariah, H. (2014). Rhetorical structure of research article introductions in applied linguistics. TEFLIN Journal, 25(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i1/59-76
Zhang, E. D., & Yu, S. (2023). Implementing digital multimodal composing in L2 writing instruction: A focus on developing L2 student writers. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(4), 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2022.2135712
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yanuarti Apsari, Nur Hidayanto Pancoro Setyo Putro, Dyah Setyowati Ciptaningrum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Pendidikan Profesi (JPP) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 12 times
