Integrating Grammarly Into Process Based Writing Approach: A Case Study of Vocational High School Students in Karawang

Authors

  • Husein Dinata Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Sidik Indra Nugraha Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Nia Pujiawati Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Abstract

The integration of Grammarly in language education has gained momentum, especially in enhancing students’ writing. Grammarly provides automated feedback on grammar, clarity, and style. However, little is known about how vocational students perceive and engage with this feedback. This study explores how vocational high school students in Karawang interact with Grammarly during the revising and editing stages of the Process-Based Writing Approach (PBWA), and how they perceive its role in their writing development. Using a qualitative method, data were collected from five students through classroom observations and semi-structured interviews. PBWA was used as the framework to examine students’ engagement and reflections. The findings reveal diverse behavioral, cognitive, and emotional responses to Grammarly feedback. Students found the tool helpful and confidence-boosting but were sometimes confused by its formality suggestions. Engagement patterns varied, including reflective revisions, active editing, and overreliance on suggestions. These findings highlight the need for instructional support to improve feedback literacy. Effective integration of Grammarly into writing instruction should include guidance to help students critically evaluate AI feedback and develop greater writing independence.

References

Agustiana, V. (2016). Combining product and process-based approaches to teaching writing discussion texts. English Review: Journal of English Education, 4(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v4i2.334

Armanda, M. L., Nugraheni, A. F., Wulansari, A., & Imron, A. (2022). "Grammarly" as English writing assistant from EFL students’ perspective. English Education:Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7(2), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v7i2.17988

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. QMiP Bulletin, 1(33), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.33.46

Dahlström, H. (2018). Digital writing tools from the student perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1563-1581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9844-x

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519

Halim, A., Sharina, S., & Zur, S. (2022). Grammarly as a tool to enhance students' self-directed learning. KnE Social Sciences, 5-13. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i8.10719

Huang, H., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The effectiveness of using Grammarly to improve students' writing skills. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning, 122-127. https://doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402594

Inayah, T. M., & Apoko, T. W. (2024). Exploring students' perspectives on the use of Grammarly in writing analytical exposition text. JLE: Journal of Literate of English Education Study Program, 5(1), 73-83. https://doi.org/10.47435/jle.v5i1.2802

Ishtiaq, M. (2019). Book review Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. English Language Teaching, 12(5), 40. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n5p40

Koh, W. (2017). Effective applications of automated writing feedback in process-based writing instruction. English Teaching, 72(3), 91-118. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.72.3.201709.91

Llausas, S. M., Ruiz, E., Ayucan, S. M., & Evardo Jr., O. J. (2024). A systematic literature review on the use of Grammarly in improving the writing skills of ESL/EFL students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(9), 3507-3516. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.10

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469

Maulidina, P., & Wibowo, H. (2022). The use of grammarly tools to enrich student's writing ability. Lingua, 18(2), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.34005/lingua.v18i2.2246

Miranty, D., & Widiati, U. (2021). Automated writing evaluation (AWE) in higher education: Indonesian EFL students' perceptions about Grammarly use across student cohorts. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction 11(4), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.11.04.12

Suryanto, S., Habiburrahim, H., Akmal, S., Zainuddin, Z., Safrul, M. S., & Hanani, F. (2024). Scrutinizing the impacts of Grammarly application on students’ writing performance and perception. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(2), 465. https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v12i2.1235

Zinkevich, N. A., & Ledeneva, T. V. (2021). Using Grammarly to enhance students’ academic writing skills. Professional Discourse & Communication, 3(4), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2021-3-4-51-63

Downloads

Published

2026-01-04

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 3 times
PDF - 1346 times