Analysis of The Characteristics of emotional Experience in MOOC Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i1.10195Keywords:
MOOC Learning, Learning experience, Emotional experienceAbstract
With the rapid development of massive open online courses (MOOCs), researchers have begun to pay attention to the experience of teachers and students in the MOOC classroom. Select the middle school mathematics curriculum standard and textbook research course in the MOOC platform of Chinese universities and collect 66 selfreported data of instantaneous experience and long-term experience of 10 learners on the course learning within two weeks. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out in 8 sub-dimensions, including device usage preferences and problems, and platform tool application. The purpose of the research is to investigate the learning experience of MOOC learning platform more comprehensively and deeply. The research results show that mobile learning has become the main way of MOOC learning. The appearance, education and economy of the tools displayed on the platform directly affect the learning experience of learners. Demonstration tools are highly dependent, but the frequency of application, types and functions of tools are limited, and there is a lack of awareness and application of tools that promote advanced learning, deep learning, and reflective learning; the overall emotional experience of learners is in a positive emotional state and shows a distinct group characteristic. The learning experience of MOOC is directly related to the appearance, education and economy of the display tools in the platform; Learners have diverse experience of platform communication and cooperation tools, and are highly dependent on learning content display tools in the platform; Learners' emotional experience is both positive and negative, but it is dominated by positive emotions and shows distinct group characteristics.
References
Wainwright S . Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses. Fink LD[J]. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 2011, 24(3):81.
Dermo J. e-Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e-assessment[J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2009, 40(2): 203-214.
Schmitt, B. H. Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to SENSE, FEEL, THINK, ACT and RELATE to Your Company and Brands [M] . New York: The Free Press,1999:17.
Podsakoff P M, Bommer W H, Podsakoff N P, et al. Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2006, 99(2): 113-142.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2007). Understanding Learning and Teach-ing: The Experience in Higher Education. College Instruction, 30 (4):209.
Yousef A M F, Chatti M A, Schroeder U, et al. What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs[C]//2014 IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. IEEE, 2014: 44-48.
Mazzarol T, Soutar G N, Thein V. Critical success factors in the marketing of an educational institution: A comparison of institutional and student perspectives[J]. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2001, 10(2): 39-57.
Everyday Experience. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology(pp. 190-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive Longitudinal Methods: An Introduction to Diary and Experience Sampling Research. New York: Guilford Press.
Weiss, H. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2011). Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-centric Work Psychology. Industrial and Organizational Psy-hology, 4 (1): 83-97.
Wang K S , Heyns P S . An empirical re-sampling method on intrinsic mode function to deal with speed variation in machine fault diagnostics[J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2011, 11(8):5015-5027.
Bassi, M., Steca, P., Fave, A. D., & Caprara, G. V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learming. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 36(3): 301-312.
Lachmann, H., Ponzer, S., Johansson, U-B., & Karlgren, K. (2012). In-troducing and Adapting a Novel Method for Investigating Learning Ex-periences in Clinical Learning Environments. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 37 (3): 125-140,
Goetz, T., Ludtke, 0., Nett, U. E.. Keller, M. M., & Lipnevich, A. A.(2013). Characteristics of teaching and students' emotions in the class-room: investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educa-tional Psychology, 38(4): 383-394.
Goetz, T., Bieg, M., Luidtke, O., Pekrun, R., & Hall, N. C. (2013). Do girls really experience more anxiety in mathematics? Psychol Science,24(10): 2079-2087.
Park, S. (2015). Examining Learning Experience in Two Online Courses Using Web Logs and Experience Sampling Method (ESM). The Design of Learning Experience (pp. 269-287). Springer International Publish-ing.
Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral Activation and Inhibition in Everyday Life. Journal of Personality & Social Psy-chology, 78:1135-1149
Hektner, J. M. , J. A. Schmidt , and M. Csikszentmihalyi . Experience Sampling Method: Measuring the Quality of Everyday Life. 2006.
Castaneda J A, Munoz-Leiva F, Luque T. Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience[J]. Information & management, 2007, 44(4): 384-396.
Evanschitzky, H., & Wunderlich, M. (2006). An Examination of Moderator Effects in the Four-stage Loyalty Model. Journal of Service Research, 8(4): 330-345.
Zhang M , Xia Y , Liu X . Network Public Opinion Energy Transmission Process Analysis of Major Medical Damage Event: "Wei Zexi" Event as an Example[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2016.
