Students’ Self-Regulated in Learning Mathematics using Realistic Mathematical Education Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i4.15059Kata Kunci:
Self-regulated learning, Realistic Mathematical Education, Learning MathematicsAbstrak
To study at school, students must have soft skills such as self-regulated learning, namely the ability of students to manage their own learning. The significance of students' self-regulated learning is what inspired this study. This study sought to ascertain the rise in students' self-regulated learning when learning mathematics using a realistic mathematics education model, as well as the students' reactions to learning mathematics using a realistic mathematics education model. This kind of study uses questionnaire analysis to do descriptive research. A self- regulated learning questionnaire and a questionnaire for students' responses made up the tool used to assess the self-regulated learning abilities that had been put to the test. Data were collected for this study to examine the rise in realistic mathematics education students' ability to learn mathematics independently, as well as the students' attitudes toward learning mathematics through mathematics education, which were assessed using a Likert attitude scale. The self-regulated learning scale is made up of four parts: the students' evaluations of how well they (1) use and locate pertinent learning resources in mathematics, (2) select and determine their learning strategies in mathematics, (3) assess and evaluate their learning outcomes in mathematics, and (4) have a positive view of themselves as mathematicians. By utilizing realistic mathematics education, the findings of this study about self-regulated learning in mathematics can be viewed as a whole. Based on the results of data analysis it is known that students' responses to realistic mathematics education models are positive which are adapted to real-life contexts or everyday life which will arouse students' self-regulated learning in solving problems because they are related to real life. This demonstrates that 98.18% of students respond positively.Referensi
Beaumont, C., Moscrop, C., & Canning, S. (2014). Easing the transition from school to HE: scaffolding the development of self-regulated learning through a dialogic approach to feedback. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(3), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2014.953460
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IHEDUC.2017.01.004
Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2018). Profiles in self-regulated learning and their correlates for online and blended learning students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1435–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11423-018-9595-9/TABLES/6
Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2018). Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/SPQ0000198
Cerezo, R., BogarÃn, A., Esteban, M., & Romero, C. (2019). Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 32(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-019-09225-Y
Daniel, G. R., Wang, C., & Berthelsen, D. (2016). Early school-based parent involvement, children’s self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An Australian longitudinal study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECRESQ.2015.12.016
DiFrancesca, D., Nietfeld, J. L., & Cao, L. (2016). A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2015.11.010
Dwi Kurino, Y., & Cahyaningsih, U. (2020). The effect of realistic mathematic education towards student’ learning motivation in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(4), 042043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042043
Haka, N. B., Rohmah, R. N., Hamid, A., & Masya, H. (2022). Cognitive Conflict-Based Conceptual Change Model on Concept Mastery & Student Self-regulation. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(1), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.23960/JPMIPA/V23I1.PP100-110
Hasibuan, A. M., Saragih, S., & Amry, Z. (2019). Development of Learning Materials Based on Realistic Mathematics Education to Improve Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/4000
Hooshyar, D., Pedaste, M., Saks, K., Leijen, Ä., Bardone, E., & Wang, M. (2020). Open learner models in supporting self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 154, 103878. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103878
Li, S., Chen, G., Xing, W., Zheng, J., & Xie, C. (2020). Longitudinal clustering of students’ self-regulated learning behaviors in engineering design. Computers & Education, 153, 103899. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2020.103899
Mardiah, N., Armiati, Permana, D., Yerizon, & Arnawa, I. M. (2021). The validity of hypothetical learning trajectory based on realistic mathematic education on function topics for grade x senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742(1), 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1742/1/012005
McCardle, L., Webster, E. A., Haffey, A., & Hadwin, A. F. (2016). Examining students’ self-set goals for self-regulated learning: Goal properties and patterns. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2153–2169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1135117
Pahrudin, A., Ahid, N., Huda, S., Ardianti, N., Putra, F. G., Anggoro, B. S., & Joemsittiprasert, W. (2020). The effects of the ECIRR learning model on mathematical reasoning ability in the curriculum perspective 2013: Integration on student learning motivation. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 675–685. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.2.675
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(APR), 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2017.00422/BIBTEX
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2017.08.004
Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Hariadi, B., Sunarto, D., Sagirani, T., Amelia, T., & Lemantara, J. (2020). Blended Web Mobile Learning (BWML) Model to Improve Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(11), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I11.12853
Prestiani, V., Irwan, & Arnawa, I. M. (2021). The development of learning design for polyhedron based on realistic mathematic education for grade vii of junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1742(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1742/1/012002
Rovers, S. F. E., Clarebout, G., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., de Bruin, A. B. H., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2019). Granularity matters: comparing different ways of measuring self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11409-019-09188-6/TABLES/3
Santoso, B., & Syarifuddin, H. (2020). Validity of mathematic learning teaching administration on realistic mathematics education based approach to improve problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012001
Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2016). Longitudinal relations between perceived autonomy and social support from teachers and students’ self-regulated learning and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 32–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LINDIF.2016.05.006
Siadaty, M., Gašević, D., & Hatala, M. (2016). Measuring the impact of technological scaffolding interventions on micro-level processes of self-regulated workplace learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2016.02.025
Siregar, R. N., Karnasih, I., & Hasratuddin, H. (2020). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis pendekatan realistik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berfikir kreatif dan self-efficacy siswa SMP (Development of learning tools based on a realistic approach to improve creative thinking skills and self-efficacy). Jurnal Pendidikan Glasser, 4(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.32529/GLASSER.V4I1.441
Siregar, R. N., Mujib, A., Karnasih, I., & Hasratuddin, H. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa melalui pendekatan matematika realistik (Improving students’ creative thinking skills through a realistic mathematical approach). Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.33487/EDUMASPUL.V4I1.338
Siregar, R. N., & Prabawanto, S. (2021). Increasing students ’ self-efficacy through a realistic mathematical education. (JIML) Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 4(2), 63–74.
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2022a). Cognitive Flexibility of Students in Solving Mathematical Problems: A Phenomenology Study. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.15294/KREANO.V13I2.40220
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2022b). Improving Student Learning: Mathematical Reasoning Ability Through A Realistic Mathematic Education. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.24127/AJPM.V11I4.6250
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S. P., & Mujib, A. (2022c). Improving students’ self-esteem in learning mathematics through a realistic mathematic education. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 1262–1277. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v23i3.pp1262-1277
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode penelitian pendidikan (Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D) (Educational research methods (quantitative, qualitative, and R&D approaches)). Alfabeta.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 713–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
Wijayanto, Z., Mutiara, H., & Pardimin, P. (2022). Implementation of the Flipped Classroom Learning Model to Improve Students’ Self-Regulated Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 23(3), 1123–1134. https://doi.org/10.23960/JPMIPA/V23I3.PP1123-1134
Winne, P. H. (2017). Cognition and Metacognition within Self-Regulated Learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315697048-3
Winne, P. H. (2019). Paradigmatic Dimensions of Instrumentation and Analytic Methods in Research on Self-Regulated Learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2019.03.026
Yamada, M., Goda, Y., Matsuda, T., Saito, Y., Kato, H., & Miyagawa, H. (2016). How does self-regulated learning relate to active procrastination and other learning behaviors? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 28(3), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12528-016-9118-9
Yamada, M., Shimada, A., Okubo, F., Oi, M., Kojima, K., & Ogata, H. (2017). Learning analytics of the relationships among self-regulated learning, learning behaviors, and learning performance. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41039-017-0053-9/TABLES/7
Yang, D. C., & Wu, W. R. (2010). The Study of Number Sense: Realistic Activities Integrated into Third-Grade Math Classes in Taiwan. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(6), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383010
Zheng, L., Li, X., & Chen, F. (2016). Effects of a mobile self-regulated learning approach on students’ learning achievements and self-regulated learning skills. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(6), 616–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1259080