THE USE OF SHOW NOT TELL TECHNIQUE TO IMPROVE THE XI GRADE OF VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING SHORT STORY

Authors

  • Lilis Sadiah IKIP Siliwangi
  • Neneng Kartika IKIP Siliwangi
  • Enung Nurhayati IKIP Siliwangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jler.v2i1.p14-21

Keywords:

Short Story, Show not tell

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the show not tell technique on learning to write short stories in class XI Vocational School. The method used is one-group pretest-posttest design, which compares the experimental group before being given treatment (pretest) and after being treated (posttest). The research subjects were 33 Chemistry A class XI in Padalarang Vocational High School 4 as many as 33 people. The ability to write short stories is measured by writing tests composing short stories. The average value of pretest = 63.9, posttest average value = 73.7. There is an increase in the average value after treatment of: 73.7 - 63.9 = 9.8. The results of the pretest and posttest were then processed with SPSS, namely the normality test, variance homogeneity, and t test. The normality test obtained the P-Value (sig.) Value of the pretest value of 0.068, the posttest value of 0.072. P-Value (sig.) 5 0.05, meaning that both data are normally distributed. Test for homogeneity of P-Value (sig.) 0.661. Because P-Value (sig.) Is greater than 0.05, Ho is accepted, meaning that the variants of the two groups of values compared are homogeneous. The t-test of the sample is correlated, the value of Sig is obtained. (2 tailed) of 0,000. because t count  t table = 59.822  2.036 then Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there is an increase between the learning outcomes of writing short stories before and after using the show not tell technique.

References

Amintaningsih. (2011). Peningkatan Menulis Cerpen Berbasis KUIK (Kerangka, Unsur Instrinsik, dan Khayalan) Melalui Model Sinektik Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Pemalang. Jurnal Linguadidaktika Volume 4 Nomor 2, Desember 2011.

Aminuddin. (2009). Pengantar apresiasi karya sastra. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Ramaja Rosda Karya.

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur penelitian. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Azis, A. (2012). Cerita pendek: sebagai bahan ajar. Cimahi: STKIP Siliwangi Bandung.

De Porter, B. dan Mike, H. (2013). Quantum learning. Bandung: Kaifa.

http://alitmahardika.blogspot.com/2013/11/teknik-menulis-show-dont-tell.html

Husamah, dan Setyaningrum. Y. (2013). Desain pembelajaran berbasis pencapaian kompetensi. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakaraya.

Jubilee Enterprise. (2014). Spss untuk pemula. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Kemendikbud. (2017). Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI.

Komara, E. (2014). Belajar dan pembelajaran interaktif. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Laksana, (2009). Keterampilan menulis kreatif. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Lilis, N. (2013). Panduan apresiasi prosa-fiksi dan pembelajarannya. Bandung: Rumput Merah.

Mustika, I. dan Azis, A. (2012). Apresiasi dan kajian prosa fiksi indonesia: sebuah pengantar. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi Bandung.

Oktapiana, A., & Lestari, R. D. (2018). ANALISIS LATAR SEBAGAI ATMOSFER DALAM CERPEN †AKU PRIMADONA †KARYA YATTI SADELI, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.vXiX.XXX

Sugiyono, (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sumiyadi, dan Durachman. M. (2014). Sanggar sastra pengalaman artistik dan estetik sastra. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Somad, A. A. dkk. (2008). Buku bahasa indonesia aktif dan kreatif berbahasa indonesia untuk kelas x SMA/MA. Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Downloads

Published

2019-03-29