Kemampuan siswa dalam memecahkan masalah program linear: Sistematik literatur review

Authors

  • Lia Halimatus Sadiah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dadang Juandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Tatang Herman Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i4.17639

Keywords:

Systematic Literature Review, Linear programming, mathematical ability, the analysis of error, the analysis of difficulties of student

Abstract

Linear programming is a contextual material in mathematics learning. But there are facts that show that there are still mistakes and difficulties experienced by students in linear programming problems. This study aims to conduct a literature review on mathematical abilities of students, errors and difficulties in linear programming problems. This study uses the SLR (Systematic Literature Review) research method. Data collection in this study was carried out by documenting and reviewing all articles regarding mathematical abilities of students, errors and difficulties on linear program problems published in the 2016-2022 period. This study used 40 accredited articles obtained from Google Scholar and Scopus. Based on this research, it was found that mathematical abilities of students to solve linear programming problems was still low. Students still make many errors in drawing conclusions and encoding errors, and still have difficulties in understanding concepts, making mathematical models and performing correct mathematical procedures.

References

Ahmad, H., Pendidikan Matematika, P., Al Asyariah Mandar, U., Mandar, P., & Barat, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pokok bahasan program linear. Jurnal MathEducation Nusantara, 1(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.32696/JMN.V1I1.3

Ariawan, B. (2015). Menyelesaikan permasalahan program linier menggunakan geogebra. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pendidikan UM, 69–85.

Ayuningsih, R., Setyowati, R. D., & Utami, R. E. (2020). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah program linear berdasarkan teori kesalahan kastolan. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(6), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.26877/imajiner.v2i6.6790

Chang, F.-R. (2004). How to solve it. in stochastic optimization in continuous time (pp. 169–224). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616747.007

Djamaluddin, A., & Wardana, W. (2019). Belajar dan pembelajaran (A. Syaddad (ed.); Vol. 1). CV. Kaaffah Learning Center.

Facione, N. C., & Facione, P. A. (1996). Externalizing the critical thinking in clinical judgment. Nursing Outlook, 44, 129–165.

Fikri, F. N., Mardiayan, & Kuswardi, Y. (2017). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan langkah-langkah facione pada materi program linear ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa kelas XI MAN Purwodadi. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika (JPMM), 1(2), 20–36. http://dissertation.laerd.com/purposive-sampling.php#types

Islami, F. H. (2021). Kajian literatur model pembelajaran bermakna (Meaningful Learning). https://doi.org/10.31219/OSF.IO/DM284

Kadir, abdul. (2013). Konsep pembelajaran kontekstual di sekolah. Dinamika Ilmu, 13(1), 17–38. http://journal.iain-samarinda.ac.id/index.php/dinamika_ilmu/article/view/20

Lusiana, S., & Putri, K. K. (2020). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa dan self confidence siswa pada materi program linier. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 26–37.

Nurjanah, S., Istiqomah, & Sujadi, A. (2018). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal program linear pada siswa kelas X TKJ SMK PIRI 2 Yogyakarta. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.

Rahmah, N. (2018). Belajar bermakna ausubel. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v1i1.54

Randolph, J. J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 14(13).

Rumetna, M. S. (2021). Optimasi jumlah produksi roti menggunakan program linear dan software pom-qm. Computer Based Information System Journal, 9(1), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.33884/cbis.v9i1.3645

Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-11

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): Juli

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.