Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa: Systematic literature review

Authors

  • Noor Annisah Sholehah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Kartika Yulianti Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • M Akbar Gulvara Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Surya Kurniawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Nur Rofi'ah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i4.17821

Keywords:

mathematical representation ability, self-efficacy, cognitive style

Abstract

This study aims to describe students' mathematical representation abilities in terms of self-efficacy and cognitive style. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is the method used in this research. The population in this study is all primary studies regarding students' mathematical representation abilities, and the sample is primary studies located in Indonesia, from 2013 to 2022, found on ERIC or Google Scholar. The research sample consisted of 31 articles consisting of 13 articles based on self-efficacy and 18 articles based on cognitive style. The conclusion is that from 2016 to 2022, every year, there are publications regarding mathematical representations, and they are dominated at the junior high school. The dominant research was conducted in the Java area, geometry is a mathematic topic that has been researched the most, and the results of this research have been published in SINTA the most. In general, mathematical representation ability is directly proportional to self-efficacy. Witkin & Goodenough theory is dominantly used in cognitive style.

Author Biographies

Noor Annisah Sholehah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Pendidikan Matematika

Kartika Yulianti, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Pendidikan Matematika

M Akbar Gulvara, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Pendidikan Matematika

Surya Kurniawan, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Pendidikan Matematika

References

Adnan, S., Juniati, D., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). Student’s mathematical representation in solving geometry problems based on cognitive style. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012049

Andini, H. P., Sunismi, & Setiawan, Y. E. (2021). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis pada pokok bahasan teorema pythagoras ditinjau dari self efficacy siswa kelas VIII SMP. JP3, 16(25), 136–151.

Apriliyani, S. W., Hartati, L., & Rahmatulloh, R. (2022). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa dalam penyelesaian soal statistika ditinjau dari self efficacy. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v7i2.11148

Ariati, C., & Juandi, D. (2018). Kemampuan penalaran matematis: systematic literature review. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 1(2), 10–27.

Aswin, A., & Juandi, D. (2022). Using watson criteria for analyzing student errors: systematic literature review (SLR). Hipotenusa : Journal of Mathematical Society, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18326/hipotenusa.v4i1.7239

Azizah, L. N., Junaedi, I., & Suhito. (2019). Kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa kelas X pada pembelajaran matematika dengan model problem based learning. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 355–365.

Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. springer.

Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 638–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1473

Brueck, J. S., & Lenhart, L. A. (2015). E-Books and TPACK. The reading teacher, 68(5), 373–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1323

Cai, J. (2005). U.S. and chinese teachers’ constructing, knowing, and evaluating representations to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(2), 135–169. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0702_3

Council, N. R. (2001). Adding it up: helping children learn mathematics (J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (eds.)). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

Fatri, F. F., Maison, M., & Syaiful, S. (2019). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa kelas VIII SMP ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 6(2), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v6i2.14179

Goldin, G., & Kaput, J. (1996). A joint perspective on the idea of representation in learning and doing mathematics (pp. 397–430).

Gulvara, M. A., Suryadi, D., & Kurniawan, S. (2023). Kesalahan siswa menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan skema fong : Systematic Literature Review. 6(2), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i2.17141

Habibi, H., Winiati, I., & Kurniawati, Y. (2020). Analisis berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics and Natural Science Education, 1(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.35719/mass.v1i2.34

Hanifah, Waluya, S. B., Isnarto, Asikin, M., & Rochmad. (2021). Analysis mathematical representation ability by self-efficacy of prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042118

Hidayat, A. F., Amin, S. M., & Fuad, Y. (2017). Profil penalaran proporsional siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika berdasarkan gaya kognitif sistematis dan intuitif. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i2.9635

Himmah, M., & Rahaju, E. B. (2021a). Analysis of student’s mathematics representation in solving mathematics problems based on spatial cognitive style. MATHEdunesa, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n2.ppdf_189-199

Himmah, M., & Rahaju, E. B. (2021b). Analysis of student’s mathematics representation in solving mathematics problems based on spatial cognitive style. MATHEdunesa, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n2.pPDF_189-199

Huda, U., Musdi, E., & Nari, N. (2019). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika. Ta’dib, 22(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v22i1.1226

Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, N.-S., Dong, J.-J., & Yang, Y.-L. (2007). Multiple representation skills and creativity effects on mathematical problem solving using a multimedia whiteboard system. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 191–212.

Idharwati, T., Rasiman, & Utami, R. E. (2019). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP kelas VIII ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field independent. Senatik, 1, 40. http://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/senatik/article/view/37

Kagan, J. (1965). Reflection-impulsivity and reading ability in primary grade children. Child Development, 36(3), 609. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126908

Keefe, J. W., & Monk, J. S. (1988). Learning style examiner’s manual. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Keen, P. G. W. (1974). Cognitive style & the problem-solving process: An Experiment.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Salinan keputusan kepala badan standar, kurikulum, dan asesmen pendidikan, kementerian pendidikan, kebudayaan, riset, dan teknologi nomor 008/h/kr/2022 tentang capaian pembelajaran pada pendidikan anak usia dini jenjang pendidikan dasar dan jenjang pendid. In Kemendikbudristek BSKAP RI (Issue 021).

Khoirina, N. J., & Rochmad. (2022). Representasi matematis ditinjau dari rasa percaya diri siswa pada pembelajaran problem posing. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Mulawarman, 2, 39–46.

Kristanto, H. Y. W., & Manoy, J. T. (2021). Representasi matematis siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif sistematis dan intuitif. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 50. https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p50-59

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lette, I., & Manoy, J. T. (2019). Representasi siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari kemampuan matematika. MATHEdunesa, 8(3), 569–575. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v8n3.p569-575

Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), e1–e34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: implications for motivation and performance. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 14(1), 1–6.

Mainali, B. (2020). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1111

McEwan, R. C., & Reynolds, S. (2007). Verbalisers and visualisers : cognitive styles that are less than equal. Faculty and Staff Publications - CRI, 4.

Mukhtar, N. M., Mulbar, U., & Upu, H. (2021). Mathematics representation ability based on self- efficacy and non-cognitive variables. 611(ICoESM), 271–277.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Robitaille, D. F., & Foy, P. (2009). TIMSS advanced 2008. international report. findings from iea’s study of achievement in advanced mathematics and physics in the final year of secondary school. http://pirls.bc.edu/timss_advanced/downloads/TA08_International_Report.pdf

Muniri, M., & Yulistiyah, E. (2022). Representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah sistem persamaan linear ditinjau dari gaya kognitif reflektif-implusif. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v2i2.1810

Nadia, L. N., Waluyo, S. B., & Isnarto. (2017). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari self efficacy peserta didik melalui inductive discovery learning. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 242–250.

Nasution, R. (2021). Addressing inequality in indonesia’s quality education. ANTARA NEWS.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.

Nurbayan, A. A., & Basuki, B. (2022). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari self-efficacy pada materi aritmatika sosial. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika: PowerMathEdu, 1(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.31980/powermathedu.v1i1.1919

Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and language. In Imagery (pp. 7–32). Elsevier.

Permana, R., Sabirin, F., & Feladi, V. (2016). Effect of self efficacy and prior knowledge on students’ skills. JETL (Journal Of Education, Teaching and Learning), 1(2), 76. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v1i2.43

Polanin, J. R., Maynard, B. R., & Dell, N. A. (2017). Overviews in education research. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 172–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631117

Posamentier, A. S., & Krulik, S. (1988). Problem solving strategies for efficient and elegant solutions: A resource for the mathematics teachers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press Inc.

Pratiwi, N. K. A., Yusmin, E., & Yani, A. (2019). Kemampuan representasi matematis menyelesaikan soal segi empat ditinjau dari self-efficacy di madrasah tsanawiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 8(9), 1–8.

Pritchard, D. (2023). What is this thing called knowledge? Taylor & Francis.

Rahmad, B. A., Ipung, Y., Abdur, R. A., Sisworo, & Dwi, R. (2016). Mathematical representation by students in building relational understanding on concepts of area and perimeter of rectangle. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(21), 2002–2008. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2813

Rahmatika, T., Ihsanudin, & Rafianti, I. (2022). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pisa berdasarkan gaya kognitif reflektif-impulsif. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 06(01), 248–258.

Riding, R., & Cheema, I. (1991). Cognitive styles—an overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110301

Sabirin, M. (2014). Representasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.18592/jpm.v1i2.49

Safrudin, M. A., Isnarto, & Junaedi, I. (2021). Mathematical representation ability based on self-efficacy on online learning through flipped classroom. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 10(2), 157–162. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/48640

Sahendra, A., Budiarto, M. T., & Fuad, Y. (2018). Students’ representation in mathematical word problem-solving: exploring students’ self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012059

Said, R. S., Subarinah, S., Baidowi, & Sripatmi. (2021). Kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari self efficacy siswa kelas VIII tahun ajaran 2020/2021. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 1(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v1i3.84

Setyawati, R. D., Ambarizka, E. B., & Handayanto, A. (2020). Profil kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP ditinjau dari self efficacy. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(2), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2020.10.2.6627

Shi, C. (2011). A study of the relationship between cognitive styles and learning strategies. Higher Education Studies, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v1n1p20

Sufriadin, S., Cahyono, E., & Busnawir, B. (2022). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa ditinjau dari self-efficacy. Jurnal Pembelajaran Berpikir Matematika (Journal of Mathematics Thinking Learning), 7(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.33772/jpbm.v7i1.25671

Surahmi, E. (2016). Representasi siswa SMA dalam memahami konsep fungsi kuadrat ditinjau dari gaya kognitif (Visualizer – Verbalizer). Sigma, 1(2), 57–63.

Susanti, H., Zubaidah, & Suratman, D. (2020). Kemampuan Representasi matematis materi ukuran pemusatan data ditinjau dari self efficacy di SMA islamiyah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 9(10), 1–10.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Elsevier.

Ulya, H., & Rahayu, R. (2020). Kemampuan representasi matematis field intermediate dalam menyelesaikan soal etnomatematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2695

Utomo, V. O. Y., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Oktavianingtyas, E. (2017). Kemampuan representasi matematis siswa gaya kognitif reflektif-impulsif dalam menyelesaikan masalah open-ended. Kadikma, 8(2), 125–134.

Villegas, J. L., Castro, E., & Gutierrez, J. (2009). Representation in problem solving: a case study with optimization problem. Electronic Journal of Research in Education Psychology, 17(7), 279–308.

Wang, C., & Lu, H. (2018). Mediating effects of individuals’ ability levels on the relationship of reflective-impulsive cognitive style and item response time in CAT. Educational Technology & Society, 21, 89+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A563457728/AONE?u=googlescholar&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=2a26f98f

Widya, H., & Manoy, J. T. (2022). Representasi matematis siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari self-efficacy siswa. MATHEdunesa: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 574–583. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/25554/23429

Witkin, H. A., & Goodenough, D. R. (1977). Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84(4), 661.

Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2004). Understanding primes: the role of representation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(3), 164. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034911.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-07-11

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2023): Juli

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.