KESIAPAN GURU MATEMATIKA DI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN KURIKULUM 2013

Authors

  • Enika Wulandari IAIN Salatiga
  • Jailani Jailani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.p483-490

Keywords:

readiness, mathematics teacher, 2013 Curriculum

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the readiness of  Mathematics teacher in Yogyakarta City to implement the 2013 Curriculum. The readiness aspect consists of insight, attitudes, and infrastructure support. This type of research is a survey research with mixed research (mixed methods). Subjects in the study were 33 Mathematics teachers from 16 junior high schools in Yogyakarta who taught grades VII and VIII. Subjects were selected by stratified random sampling technique. Data collection techniques are carried out through questionnaires, observations, and interviews. Data were analyzed descriptively. The results of research on the readiness of junior high school mathematics teachers in the city of Yogyakarta to implement the 2013 curriculum in accordance with the criteria are quite good. Aspects of teacher insight about the 2013 Curriculum are quite good, the completeness of 2013 Curriculum documents is good, participation in curriculum education activities is not good, the ability to prepare lesson plans is quite good, the attitude of teachers towards the 2013 Curriculum is quite good, the completeness of facilities and infrastructure is quite good. 2013 curriculum. The results of the study are expected to be taken into consideration for policy making relating to the implementation of the 2013 Curriculum.

Author Biography

Enika Wulandari, IAIN Salatiga

Tadris Matematika

References

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3th edition). Sage.

Figueroa, L. L., Lim, S., & Lee, J. (2016). Annals of GIS investigating the relationship between school facilities and academic achievements through geographically weighted regression. Annals of GIS, 22(4), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475683.2016.1231717

Howley, C. (2012). Readiness for change. icfi.com

Mackinlay, M. (2014). Teachers ’ response to curriculum reforms : primary (Issue February).

Mccoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. (2013). Instrument development in the affective domain: school and corporate applications (3th editio). Springer.

Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia, (2009).

Nepal, B. (2016). Relationship among school’s infrastructure facilities , learning environment and student’s outcome. International Journal for Research in Social Science and Humanities Research, 2(5), 44–57.

Omae, Siocha, N., Onderi, H., & Benard, M. (2017). Quality implications of learning infrastructure on performance in secondary education: a small scale study of a country in Kenya. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(4), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.344956

PeÅ¡ková, K., Spurná, M., & Knecht, P. (2019). Teachers ’ acceptance of curriculum reform in the Czech republic : one decade later sprejetje kurikularne prenove uÄiteljev na ÄŒeÅ¡kem : desetletje pozneje. 9, 73–97. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.560

Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3th editio). The Free Press A Division of Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Ruhyana, N. F., & Aeni, A. N. (2019). Effect of educational facilities and infrastructure in primary schools on students ’ learning outcomes. 6(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.15225

Terhart, E. (2013). Teacher resistance against school reform : reflecting an inconvenient truth. School Leadership & Management, 33(5), 486–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.793494

Wibowo, R., & Wutsqa, D. (2014). The evaluation of the implementation of KTSP of mathematics subject in SMP in yogyakarta city. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i1.2664

Downloads

Published

2020-09-28

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 5 (2020): JPMI

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.