ANALISIS STRATEGI PQ4R DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR SISWA PADA TOPIK ALJABAR

Authors

  • Mohammad Archi Maulyda FKIP, Universitas Mataram http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-1380
  • Asri Fauzi FKIP, Universitas Mataram
  • Lalu Hamdian Affandi FKIP, Universitas Mataram
  • Linda Feni Haryati FKIP, Universitas Mataram
  • Siti Istiningsih FKIP, Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.p%25p

Keywords:

PQ4R, Scientific, Algebra

Abstract

The use of the lecture method causes low participation, student progress, student attention, and interest cannot be monitored. The inactivity of students during the learning process is one of the factors that can cause students to difficult to understand the concept of material. If this happens it can result in less than optimal learning outcomes obtained. The type of research used is True-experimental Design with Pretest-Posttest control group Design type. The independent variable in this study is the PQ4R model with a scientific approach. While the dependent variable is learning outcomes. The population in this study were students of class VIII. The sample of this research is a class of 25 students. Determination of the sample using a cluster type random sampling technique. Data collection instruments include lesson plans, observation sheets of student activities, observation widths of teacher activities, pre-test, and post-test learning outcomes. The data analysis technique used an independent sample t-test which was previously tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov method with the help of SPSS for windows version 17.0. The results showed: (1) The teacher can carry out PBM activities well and in accordance with the learning plan in accordance with the syntax. (2) Student activities are in accordance with what is expected from the frequency of the many activities that illustrate PBM with the PQ4R strategy with a scientific approach. This shows that the PQ4R strategy can affect student learning outcomes

Author Biographies

Mohammad Archi Maulyda, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen, Prodi PGSD, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Asri Fauzi, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen, Prodi PGSD, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Lalu Hamdian Affandi, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen, Prodi PGSD, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Linda Feni Haryati, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen, Prodi PGSD, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Siti Istiningsih, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen, Prodi PGSD, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

References

Annizar, A. M., Maulyda, M. A., Khairunnisa, G. F., & Hijriani, L. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA pada Topik Geometri. Jurnal Elemen, 6(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i1.1688

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Donuata, P. B. (2019). Pengaruh quantum teaching metode PQ4R berdasarkan keragaman kecerdasan terhadap hasil belajar fisika. JRKPF, 6(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v6i1.11094

Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). A Match or Mismatch Between Learning Styles of The Teachers. International Journal Modern Education and Computer Science, 1(1), 51–60.

Hasanah, A., Kusumah, Y. S., & ’Ulya, Z. (2017). Visual Communication-Based Mathematics Learning Material for Deaf Students. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teaching, 22(2), 66–77.

Hraste, M., Giorgio, A. De, Mandi, P., Padulo, J., & Grani, I. (2018). When mathematics meets physical activity in the school-aged child : The effect of an integrated motor and cognitive approach to learning geometry. PLoS ONE, 13(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0196024

Istiqomah, F., Rochmad, & Mulyono. (2017). Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability of the Seventh Grade Students in Terms of Learning Styles to the Preview-Question-Read-Reflect-Recite-Review (PQ4R) Learning. Unnes Journal OfMathematics Education, 6(2), 258–267. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v6i2.17201

Jay, T., Rose, J., & Simmons, B. (2018). Why Is Parental Involvement in Children ’ s Mathematics Learning Hard ? Parental Perspectives on Their Role Supporting Children ’ s Learning. SAGE Open, 4(14), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018775466

Khoirunisa, A., Haryati, S., & Rery, R. U. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Preview, Question, Read, Reflect, Recite, Review (PQ4R) Pada Pokok Bahasan Kesetimbangan Ion dan pH Larutan Garam. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 4(2), 74–80.

Leatham, K. R., Peterson, B. E., Stockero, S. L., & Zoest, L. R. Van. (2015). Conceptualizing Mathematically Significant Pedagogical Opportunities to Build on Student Thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 88–124. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.46.1.0088

Maharani, H. R. (2014). Creative Thinking in Mathematics: Are We Able to Solve Mahematical Problems in a Variety of Way? International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education, 23. Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Maulyda, A. M., Hidayati, V. R., Erfan, M., Umar, & Sutisna, D. (2020). Kesalahan Komunikasi Matematis (Tertulis) Siswa Ketika Memahami Soal Cerita. Jurnal Karya Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1–7.

Maulyda, M. A., Annizar, A. M., Hidayati, V. R., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analysis of students ’ verbal and written mathematical communication error in solving word problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(012083), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012083

Maulyda, M. A., Rahmatih, A. N., Gunawan, Hidayati, V. R., & Erfan, M. (2020). Retroactive Thinking Interference of Grade VI Students : A Study on the Topics of PISA Literacy Lessons. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(Maret), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012037

Obasi, C., & Ugo, C. (2018). Predicting Growth Rate of Students ’ Achievement in Mathematics Using Mathematical Growth Model. SJME : Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 44–51.

Pike, G. R., Hansen, M. J., & Childress, J. E. (2014). The influence of students’ pre-college characteristics, high school experiences, college expectations, and initial enrollment characteristics on degree attainment. Journal of College Student Retention, 16(1), 1–23.

Rodli, M. (2015). Applying PQ4R Strategy for Teaching Reading. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(1), 34–46.

Rutschow, E. Z., & Mayer, A. K. (2018). Early findings from a national survey of developmental education practices. Journal of Education and Training, 2(4), 78–89.

Saxon, P., & Martirosyan, N. M. (2017). NADE members respond: Improving accelerated developmental mathematics courses. Journal of Developmental Education, 41(1), 24–27.

Staats, S., & Laster, L. A. (2018). Extending Universal Design for Learning through Concurrent Enrollment : Algebra Teachers ’ Perspectives. Education Sciences, 8(154), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040154

Triana, M., & Zubainur, C. M. (2019). Students ’ Mathematical Communication Ability through the Brain-Based Learning Approach using Autograph. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 4(1), 1–10.

Yuliana, I., & Fajriah, N. (2013). Penerapan Metode PQ4R dalam Pembelajran Matematika di Kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 27–33.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-03

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 4 (2020): JPMI

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.