LEVEL BERPIKIR METAKOGNISI MAHASISWA SELAMA PERKULIAHAN ONLINE DI MASA PANDEMI

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i6.p%25p

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Metacognition, Online Learning

Abstract

The ability to reflect on yourself or think metacognition is very important for students. Because with this ability students can learn to analyze their mistakes or weaknesses to be corrected and developed in the future. During the pandemic, lectures were carried out online, this resulted in a tendency for students to not seriously attend lectures. The absence of direct supervision from lecturers is one of the reasons this can happen. Thus, researchers assume that the level of metacognition of students who carry out lectures online will also decrease. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the level of student metacognition during online lectures that have been implemented. Researchers used a qualitative descriptive research approach with a survey method. The research subjects were 120 students who had attended online courses at least 8 meetings or 2 months. The results showed that 83 students were at the lowest level of metacognition (Tacit Use). Meanwhile, students who are at the highest metacognition level are 2 students (Reflective Use). Thus, researchers can conclude that the level of student metacognition during online lectures is still very low.

Author Biographies

Mohammad Archi Maulyda, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen

Anton Budiharjo, Politeknik Keselamatan Transportasi Jalan

Dosen

Muhammad Erfan, FKIP, Universitas Mataram

Dosen

R Radha, Department of History, Alagappa University

Dosen

References

Adiarto, A. (2017). Perbedaan Pengaruh Pembelajaran Metakognisi Melalui Metode Inkuiri Dan Metode Berbasis Masalah Terhadap Peningkatan Pemahaman Konsep Ips Dan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik (Studi Eksperimen Kuasi Di Kelas Vii Smp Negeri 2 Menes – Pandeglang). Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 26(1), 8–17.

Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (p. 233). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n22

Alqahtani, M. S. M., Bhaskar, C. V., & Elumalai, K. V. (2018). WhatsApp: An Online Platform for University-Level English Language Education. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 108–121. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.7

Berizzi, G., Di Barbora, E., & Vulcani, M. (2017). Metacognition in the e-Learning environment: A successful proposition for inclusive education. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1381

Bolsoni-Silva, A. T., & Loureiro, S. R. (2014). The role of social skills in social anxiety of university students. Paideia, 24(58), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272458201410

Cera, R., Mancini, M., & Antonietti, A. (2014). Relationships between Metacognition, Self-efficacy and Self-regulation in Learning. ECPS - Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 1(7), 115–141. https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2013-007-cera

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Pragmatism and design thinking. International Journal of Design, 14(5), 114–126.

Dunn, L. S., Lewis-Kipkulei, P., & Bower, R. (2019). Metacognition of First Year Occupational Therapy Students: A Comparison of Entry-Level Degrees. Journal of Occupational Therapy Education, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.26681/jote.2019.030401

Düzeylerİnİn, Ü., Yaşam, V. E., & İncelenmesİ, D. (2018). Investigation of the Metacognition Level and Life Satisfaction of the University Students Studying in Preschool Teaching and Child Development Programs. LIFE SKILLS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2(4), 345–359.

Efklides, A. (2014). How does metacognition contribute to the regulation of learning? An integrative approach. Psihologijske Teme, 23(1), 1–30.

Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., & Pajarungi, A. (2020). Identifikasi Level Kognitif pada Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Gasal Kelas IV Identifikasi Level Kognitif pada Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Gasal Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. 8(March), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22601.70242

Esterhuysen, S., & Stanz, K. J. (2014). Locus of Control and Online Learning. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 30(1), 63–71.

Faradillah, A. (2018). Analysis of Mathematical Reasoning Ability of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers in Solving Algebra Problem Based on Reflective and Impulsive Cognitive Style. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v8i2.2333

Finch, P., & Bessonnette, S. (2014). A pragmatic investigation into the effects of massage therapy on the self efficacy of multiple sclerosis clients. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 18(1), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.04.001

Fischhoff, B., & Broomell, S. B. (2020). Judgment and decision making. In Annual Review of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050747

Gross, Z., & Rutland, S. D. (2017). Experiential learning in informal educational settings. International Revolution Education, 6(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1115901796256

Hoque, E. (2017). Memorization: A Proven Method of Learning. International Journal of Applied Research, 22(1), 142–150.

Jabusch, H. C. (2016). Setting the stage for self-regulated learning instruction and metacognition instruction in musical practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(8), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01319

Kohen, Z., & Kramarski, B. (2012). Developing Self-Regulation by Using Reflective Support in a Video-Digital Microteaching Environment. Education Research International, 20(12), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/105246

Kovach, M., & Montgomery, H. (2010). What kind of learning ? For what purpose ? Reflections on a critical adult education approach to online Social Work and Education courses serving Indigenous distance learners. Critical Social Work, 11(May), 27–61.

Kusnadi. (2016). Pantun Melayu: Kajian Terhadap Pesan Dakwah Dalam Tafsir al-Azhar. Wardah, 17(2), 155–173.

Luman, M., Van Meel, C. S., Oosterlaan, J., & Geurts, H. M. (2012). Reward and punishment sensitivity in children with ADHD: Validating the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire for children (SPSRQ-C). Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5(3), 56–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-011-9547-x

Mahmudul Haque, M. (2019). From Cognition, Metacognition to Autonomy: A Framework for Understanding Language Learning Dynamics. Arab World English Journal, 12(1), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/efl1.15

Maulyda, M. A., Annizar, A. M., Hidayati, V. R., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analysis of students ’ verbal and written mathematical communication error in solving word problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(012083), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012083

Medová, J., Rybanský, Ľ., Naštická, Z., & Páleníková, K. (2017). ERROR ANALYSIS OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ SOLUTIONS OF GRAPH ALGORITHM PROBLEM. ERIC, 3(2), 209–215.

Merina Pratiwi. (2020). Student Tutoring, Facilitator and Explaining Models: A Problem Solving Metacognition towards Learning Achievements of Informatics Students. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 368–379.

Nugroho, A. A. (2017). The implementation of collaborative-based guided discovery reviewed from students’ analytical thinking skills and social skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14508

Oonk, W., Verloop, N., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2019). Analyzing student teachers ’ use of theory in their reflections on mathematics teaching practice. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(7), 451–462.

Pei, L., & Wu, H. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education ? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538

Perera, K. V. D., Miskitha, P. N., Jayasekera, J. P. H. P. K., Pathirana, C. P. S., & Weerasekera, K. S. (2016). Performance of a Sensitivity Analysis on the Multi-Function Network Survey Vehicle (MFNSV). ENGINEER, XLIX(03), 21–29.

Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, V. S., & Saravanakumar, A. R. (2020). E-Learning during Lockdown of Covid-19 Pandemic: A Global Perspective. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 1088–1099.

Ray, S., & Ray, M. K. (2012). Incorporation of peer learning in first MBBS curriculum to enhance metacognition skills. Al Ameen J Med Sci, 5(4), 339–342.

Regina, C., & Alves, L. (2020). Vertical social distancing policy is ineffective to contain the COVID-19 pandemic. Cadernos De Saude Publica, 36(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00084420

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. In Reading (1st ed.). Canada: Focus on ExCale.

Soliemanifar, Behroozi, & Moghaddam, S. (2015). Role of Personality Traits , Learning Styles and Metacognition in Predicting Critical Thinking of Undergraduate Students. Bimonthly of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 8(1), 59–67.

Toom, A., Husu, J., & Patrikainen, S. (2015). Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 7(3), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2014.943731

Tyaningsih, R. Y., Baidowi, & Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Integration of Character Education in Basic Mathematics Learning in the Digital Age. Atlantis Press, 465(Access 2019), 156–160.

Tzohar-Rozen, M., & Kramarski, B. (2014). Metacognition, Motivation and Emotions: Contribution of Self-Regulated Learning to Solving Mathematical Problems. Global Education Review, 1(4), 76–95.

Valencia-Vallejo, N., López-Vargas, O., & Sanabria-Rodríguez, L. (2019). Effect of a metacognitive scaffolding on self-efficacy, metacognition, and achievement in e-learning environments. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.001

Vinney, L. A., Friberg, J. C., & Smyers, M. (2018). Case-based Perspective-Taking as a Mechanism to Improve Metacognition and Higher-Level Thinking in Undergraduate Speech-Language Pathology Students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 19(3), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v19i2.24006

Downloads

Published

2020-11-17

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 6 (2020): JPMI

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.