THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SMALL GROUP DISCUSSIONS IN THE TEACHING OF CONDITIONAL CLAUSES

Authors

  • Jonathan Tanihardjo Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
  • Rex Stardy Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v6i3.p586-590

Abstract

In the past, when it came to teaching grammar, it had been a common practice that teachers were the ones to more actively engage in the teaching and learning process and students only needed to pay attention to the lecture. Teachers believed it worked more effectively than other methods, since they would give many examples necessary and provide comprehensive explanation on the targeted grammar rules. However, grammar is one of the language components that are often considered challenging and relatively trivial in language learning, and for that reason, language learners are often reluctant to learn the rule of a language inside and out. Up until now, teachers have been trying to find ways or methods that might work to make learning more effective, one of which is small group discussion, where learners are expected to get more involved in a discussion, increase student participation, promote critical thinking, and so on. The participants of this study were the students of the English Department who were taking the English Grammar class. The participants were divided into 2 groups, where the first group serves as a control group and the second as an experimental group. Pre- and post-tests about the application of conditional clauses were administered to both groups to find out and measure the effectiveness of each method: lecture and group discussion methods. The results show both methods worked in boosting the students’ understanding and scores. However, lecture method worked more effectively in this study. The study also shows that getting students to actively involve in the teaching-learning process when they are not ready will not produce favourable results, as there are possible reasons that hinder the process.

 

Keywords:  Effectiveness; Small Group Discussions; Lecture; Conditional Sentences

References

Gewehr, W. (1998). Aspects of Modern Language Teaching in Europe. New York: Routledge.

Jacobsen, D. A., Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2009). Methods for Teaching: Promoting Student Learning in K-12 Classrooms. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Michael, J. (2001). The Claude Bernard Disginguished Lecture. In Pursuit of meaningful learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 145-158.

Paul, R. C. (1990). Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapildly Changing World. Rohnert Park, California: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique, Sonoma State University.

Rahman, F., Khalil, J. K., Jumani, N. B., Ajmal, M., Malik, S., & Sharif, M. (2011). Impact of Discussion Method on Students Performance. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(7), 84-94.

Tanihardjo, J. (2016). Analysis of the Effectiveness of Deductive and Inductive Method in the Teaching of Participial Phrase: A Case Study. Twelfth Conference on English Studies (hal. 149-152). Jakarta: Atma Jaya Catholic University.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-11