The Development of Paper Graph Media to Reduce Students’ Mathematical Dysgraphia

Authors

  • Sandy Ihsan Amarulloh Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
  • Puji Lestari Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia
  • Eko Yulianto Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v9i1.30974

Keywords:

Mathematical Dysgraphia , Paper Graph , Elementary School

Abstract

Students with mathematical dysgraphia frequently experience procedural errors in column-based arithmetic due to difficulties in visual–motor integration and spatial organization. These difficulties often result in misaligned digits, incorrect column placement, digit misreading, and improper regrouping, which are commonly categorized as Watson Errors. This study aims to develop Papergraph media as a visual structural learning medium to reduce mathematical errors in students with mathematical dysgraphia. This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the ADDIE model, consisting of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The media were developed based on a needs analysis focusing on students’ visual–motor characteristics and common procedural error patterns in arithmetic operations. Papergraph was designed as a grid-based medium to support accurate digit placement, place-value alignment, and vertical operational structure. The implementation of the developed media was evaluated using a Single Subject Research (SSR) design with an A–B–A pattern involving a fourth-grade elementary school student identified as having characteristics of mathematical dysgraphia. Data were collected through repeated measurement of arithmetic performance and analysis of Watson-type errors across baseline, intervention, and withdrawal phases.The results showed a significant reduction in mathematical errors during the intervention phase, particularly in digit misreading, column misplacement, incorrect digit combination, and regrouping errors. Performance improvements were maintained during the baseline-2 phase, indicating the internalization of spatial organization strategies facilitated by the Papergraph media. In conclusion, Papergraph demonstrates strong potential as an effective visual–structural learning medium to improve procedural accuracy and reduce Watson Errors in students with mathematical dysgraphia.

References

Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003

Anderson, J. R. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51(4), 355–365.

Ashlock, R. B. (2010). Error patterns in computation: Using error patterns to help each student learn (10th ed.). Pearson.

Barnes, M., & Smiley, A. (2020). Visual–motor integration and mathematical error patterns in elementary learners. Journal of Learning Difficulties, 43(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420913924

Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2010). Inter-relationships among behavioral markers, genes, brain and treatment in dyslexia and dysgraphia. Psychology Press.

Berninger, V. W., & Richards, T. L. (2011). Brain literacy for educators and psychologists. Academic Press.

Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Hammill, D. D. (2015). Mathematics interventions for students with learning disabilities. Pearson.

Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Pfannenstiel, K., Porterfield, J., & Gersten, R. (2015). Improving the mathematics performance of students with learning disabilities using explicit and systematic instruction. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714541485

Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J., & Williams, L. (2004). Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105

Clements, D. H., & Ellerton, N. (2018). Children’s errors in multicolumn arithmetic: A spatial perspective. Mathematics Education Review, 30(1), 17–33.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333(6045), 968–970. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204537

Cohen, L. (2020). Structural alignment errors in primary grade computation. International Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 61, 100844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmbe.2020.100844

Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750

Feder, K. P., & Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 49(4), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00282.x

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., & Hamlett, C. (2020). Mathematics problem-solving errors among students with learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 54(3), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919871587

Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Single subject research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203

Jones, K., & Dyson, N. (2019). Grid-based supports for alignment in arithmetic tasks. Primary Mathematics Journal, 28(4), 22–30.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Kim, M., & Lambert, R. (2020). Visual–spatial scaffolds and accuracy in written mathematics for students with handwriting difficulties. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 57, 100741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100741

Kim, Y. S., & Lambert, R. G. (2020). The role of visual scaffolding in mathematical writing accuracy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219420913924

Kratochwill, T. R., et al. (2013). Single-case design technical documentation. What Works Clearinghouse.

Lee, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2019). Dysgraphia and mathematical performance: The role of visual-motor coordination. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Meltzer, L. (2018). Executive function in education (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST.

Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948707312210

Mulligan, J. T., & Mitchelmore, M. C. (2009). Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 21(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-009-0003-

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success. U.S. Department of Education.

Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1–55). Erlbaum.

Odom, S. L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R., Thompson, B., & Harris, K. (2010). Research in special education: Scientific standards and implications for practice. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600202

Paas, F., & Ayres, P. (2014). Cognitive load theory: A broader view on the role of memory in learning. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9247-7

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1

Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. In International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.).

Pramuditya, S. A., & Kartini, K. (2019). Analisis kesalahan prosedural siswa dengan hambatan visual-motorik. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpm.v13i2.15330

Rahayu, P., & Fadillah, A. (2021). Media grid dan peningkatan akurasi digit. Jurnal Pendidikan Khusus, 17(1), 45–56.

Riccomini, P. J., & Witzel, B. S. (2010). Response to intervention in mathematics. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42(3), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991004200301

Rosenblum, S. (2016). Handwriting and spacing deficits in children with dysgraphia. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 48, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.09.014

Rosenblum, S., & Livneh-Zirinski, M. (2018). Visual organization interventions and computational accuracy in elementary students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(5), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219417728571

Siegler, R. S. (2017). Children’s thinking (6th ed.). Pearson.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Springer.

Vaughn, S., & Bos, C. (2020). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Pearson.

Watson, J. (1980). Patterns of computational error in elementary arithmetic. Elementary Mathematics Journal, 12(3), 29–35.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 716 times