ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK: TREN RISET EPISTEMOLOGICAL OBSTACLE DARI TAHUN 2000–2022

Penulis

  • Ikbal Pauji Indonesia University of Education
  • Rahmat Kusharyadi Indonesia University of Education
  • Ahmad Zulfa Khotimi Indonesia University of Education

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i3.17583

Kata Kunci:

Mathematics, Learning obstacles, Epistemological obstacles, VOSviewer

Abstrak

Mathematics is an abstract science so that in the learning process it is often difficult for students to understand the material because students have learning difficulties. Learning barriers consist of 3 namely ontogenic obstacles, epistemological obstacles and didactical obstacles. This study aims to analyze the trend of writing articles with the theme of epistemological obstacles in mathematics learning from 2000 to 2022. Articles are analyzed based on country of origin, authors and institutions that produce articles with the most citations and link strength. The analysis uses the method of bibliometric analysis. The sample used was 61 search results articles using database dimensions with the keyword epistemological obstacles in mathematics. The results of the analysis show that this study fluctuates every year. Didi Suryadi is the author with the most authors and the author with the most total links and Athanasios Gagatsis is the author with the highest number of citations. The themes regarding form, learning obstacles, researchers, operations, participants, and didactical design research are the newest themes related to epistemological obstacles in mathematics so that they can become references for updating further research.

Referensi

Al Husaeni, D. F., & Nandiyanto, A. B. D. (2022). Bibliometric computational mapping analysis of publications on mechanical engineering education using vosviewer. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 17(2), 1135–1149.

Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Eck, N. J. van, Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Berg, J. van den. (2010). A comparison of twotechniques for bibliometric mapping: multidimensional scaling and VOS. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2405–2416. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi

Effendy, F., Gaffar, V., Hurriyati, R., & Hendrayati, H. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik perkembangan penelitian penggunaan pembayaran seluler dengan vosviewer. Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 16(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v16i1.83

Elfiah, N. S., Maharani, H. R., & Aminudin, M. (2020). Hambatan epistemologi siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah bangun ruang sisi datar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 11–22.

Ellili, N. O. D. (2022). Bibliometric analysis on corporate governance topics published in the journal of corporate governance: the international journal of business in society. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 23(1), 262–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2022-0135

Gupta, B. M., & Bhattacharya, S. (2004). Bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics of science and technology. DESIDOC Bulletin of Information Technology, 24(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.14429/dbit.24.1.3616

Haniyah, D., & Joko Soebagyo. (2021). Analisis bibliometrik terhadap kemampuan komunikasi matematis dalam pembelajaran matematika berdasarkan perbedaan gender berbasis VOSViewer. Buana Matematika : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.36456/buanamatematika.v11i2.3966

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2005). Advanced mathematical-thinking at any age: its nature and its development. Advanced Mathematical Thinking: A Special Issue of Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315045955

Herman, H. (2008). Mengajar belajar matematika. Depdikbud.

Hidayat, C. R., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2019). Epistemological obstacle on the topic of triangle and quadrilateral. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042110

Job, P., & Schneider, M. (2014). Empirical positivism, an epistemological obstacle in the learning of calculus. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0604-0

Julius, R., Halim, M. S. A., Hadi, N. A., Alias, A. N., Khalid, M. H. M., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of research in mathematics education using scopus database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/11329

Kandaga, T., Rosjanuardi, R., & Juandi, D. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in transformation geometry based on van hiele’s level. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11914

Kusharyadi, R., Pertiwi, S., Siahaan, E. Y. S., & Dasari, D. (2023). Bibliometric analysis : sofware usage trends geogebra in mathematics learning from 2017 - 2022. 11(1), 196–205.

Maknun, C. L. L. Il, RosjanRuardi, R., & Jupri, A. (2022). Epistemological obstacle in learning trigonometry. Mathematics Teaching-Research Journal, 14(2), 5–25.

Prediger, S. (2008). The relevance of didactic categories for analysing obstacles in conceptual change: Revisiting the case of multiplication of fractions. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.08.001

Prihandhika, A., Prabawanto, S., Turmudi, T., & Suryadi, D. (2020). Epistemological obstacles: an overview of thinking process on derivative concepts by apos theory and clinical interview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032028

Rahmah, N. (2018). Hakikat Pendidikan matematika. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v1i2.88

Subroto, T., & Suryadi, D. (2018). Epistemological obstacles in mathematical abstraction on abstract algebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012032

Suryadi, D. (2019). Landasan filosofis penelitian desain didaktis (DDR) (Tim Gapura Press (ed.); 1st ed.). GAPURA PRESS.

Tambunan, K. (2013). Riset unggulan terpadu: kajian bibliometrika. Jurnal Informasi Dan Dokumentasi, 34(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v34i2.176

Tekdal, M. (2021). Trends and development in research on computational thinking. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 26, Issue 5). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10617-w

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2013). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Managemen, 19(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2013.03.011

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric m apping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2017a). Epistemological obstacles on the topic of ratio and proportion among junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012066

Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2017b). Epistemological obstacles on the topic of ratio and proportion among junior high school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012066

Yığ, K. G. (2022). Research trends in mathematics education: A quantitative content analysis of major journals 2017-2021. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202215529

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2023-05-19

Terbitan

Vol 6 No 3 (2023): Mei

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.