PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TES UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KOMPUTASI SISWA

Authors

  • Fadhilah Nur Sa’diyyah UIN Alauddin Makassar
  • Sitti Mania UIN Alauddin Makassar
  • Suharti Suharti UIN Alauddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i1.p%25p

Keywords:

Development, Test Instrument, and Computational Thinking

Abstract

Mathematics learning in the 2013 curriculum emphasizes the pedagogic dimension which aims to create active students so that they are able to develop their mindset and accustom them to finding solutions to their own problems. This research aims to develop test instrumen to measure computational thinking on number and sequence pattern material in SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa that meets valid and practical criteria. The purpose of this study was to determine the process of developing test instrumen to measure computational thinking on number and sequence pattern material in SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa. This research is a type of Research and Development (R&D) that focused on development model of B&G (Borg & Gall) which contains 4 stages: the information gathering stage, the planning stage, the development stage, validation and trial stage. The subjects of the trial were students of class VIII SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa. The instruments used in this study were the validation sheet and the teacher response questionnaire. Based on the Results of the study, it was found that (1) the validation results for test instrumen to measure computational thinking were 4,46 so that they only uses a teacher response questionnaire for all aspects in the very positive category with a percentage of 90,6%. So it can be concluded that test instrumen to measure computational thinking on number and sequence pattern material in SMP Negeri 2 Sungguminasa meet the validity and practicality criteria.

References

Aho, A. V. (2012). Computation and Computational Thinking. 55(7), 2010–2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxs074

Amirzan. (2017). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Gerak Dasar Lokomotor Pada Siswa SD Kelas V. 2(1), 85–96.

Angriani, A. D., Nursalam, N., & Batari, T. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis. Alauddin: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24252/auladuna.v5i1a1.2018

Asih, T. (2018). Perkembangan Tingkat Kignitif Peserta Didik di Kota Metro. 2, 9–17.

Cahyadi, R. A. H. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis ADDIE Model. 3(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.21070/halaqa.v3i1.2124

Dasopang, M. D. (2017). BELAJAR DAN PEMBELAJARAN. 03(2), 333–352.

Fajri, M., Yurniawati., & Utomo, E. (2019). Computational Thinking , Mathematical Thinking Berorientasi Gaya Kognitif Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Sekolah Dasar. Dinamika Matematika Sekolah Dasar 1 (1), 1-18, 1(1), 1–18.

Fuadi, R., Johar, R., & Munzir, S. (2016). Peningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematis melalui Pendekatan Kontekstual. 3(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v3i1.4305

Kawuri, K. R., Budiharti, R., & Fauzi, A. (2019). Penerapan Computational Thinking untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas X MIA 9 SMA Negeri 1 Surakarta pada Materi Usaha dan Energi 6. 9, 116–121.

Kurniaman, O., & Noviana, E. (2017). Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan, Sikap, dan Pengetahuan. 6, 389–396.

Magdalena, I., Hifziyah, M., Aeni, V. N., & Rahayu, R. P. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Siswa Tingkat Sekolah Dasar Kabupaten Tangerang. 2, 227–237.

Majid, A. (2013). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Kompetensi Guru. In Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Malik, S., Prabawa, H. W., & Rusnayati, H. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa Melalui Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Model Quantum Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 8(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34438.83526

Mufidah, I. (2018). Profil Berpikir Komputasi dalam menyelesaikan Bebras Task ditinjau dari Kecerdasan Logis Matematis siswa. November.

Rahmawati, A., Husnadi, M., & Haj, M. I. (2019). Implementasi KAHOOT sebagai Instrumen Tes Pembelajaran Fisika di Era Digital. 3(November), 23–34.

Setyosari, P. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan & Pengembangan. In Metode Penelitian Pendidikan & Pengembangan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Siagian, M. D., Matematika, P., & Pendahuluan, A. (2017). Issn 2086-4205. Pembelajaran Matematika Dalam Perspektif Konstruktivisme, VII(2), 61–73.

Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi siswa pada pelajaran matematika : studi pendahuluan pada siswa yang menyenangi game. 224–232.

Sukardi. (2017). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: kompetensi dan praktiknya / Sukardi. In 1. PENDIDIKAN - METODOLOGI PENELITIAN,Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: kompetensi dan praktiknya / Sukardi. https://doi.org/2009

Yasin, M. (2020). Asesmen Penulisan Jurnal untuk Meningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi (Journal Writing Assessment to Improve Computational Thinking Ability) 1 1. 0–21.

Zhang, L., & Nouri, J. (2019). A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K- A systematic review of learning computational thinking through Scratch in K-9. July. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103607

Downloads

Published

2021-01-05

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): JPMI

Section

Articles

License

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.