PRESUPPOSITION AND IDEOLOGY: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF JOE BIDEN’S INAUGURAL SPEECH

Zainal Arifin Renaldo

Abstract


The 2020 U.S presidential election came with the result of Joe Biden’s victory. This research is aimed at investigating Biden’s ideology manifested in his inaugural speech which was delivered on January 20, 2021. The analysis in this research was conducted under the theory of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). In finding the ideology, the researcher worked on the microstructure level by studying the presupposition as proposed by Dijk. The result of this research shows that there are three types of presupposition present in Biden’s inaugural speech i.e. lexical, existential, and factive in which lexical presupposition appear to be the most frequent one. The analysis of the presupposition also result to the finding of Biden’s ideology manifestation towards the issue of immigrants, healthcare, racism, democracy, and climate change.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bayram, F. (2010). Ideology and Political Discourse: a Critical Discourse Analysis of Erdogan’S Political Speech. Arecls, 7(January 2009), 23–24. http://research.ncl.ac.uk/ARECLS/volume7/bayram_vol7.pdf

Fairclough, N. (2020). Language and power 2000. In Language and Power. Longman Group Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250-15

Jeffries, L. (2007). Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Palgrave Macmillan.

Keegan, S. (2009). Qualitative research: Good decision making through understanding people, cultures and markets. Kogan Page Publishers.

Puspasari, A. (2014). Presuppositions in the slogans of Indonesian Universities. Jurnal Bina Bahasa, 7(1), 1–16.

Van Dijk, T. (1997). Discourse as interaction in society. In T. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1–37). SAGE Publications Ltd.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Ideology and discourse analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310600687908

Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse and Society, 17(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506060250

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Power. Palgrave Macmillan.

Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual. In The Discourse of Politics in Action: Politics as Usual. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316539

Wodak, R., & Kendall, G. (2007). What is critical discourse analysis? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 8(2), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.7203/qfilologia.11.5041

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i3.p497-503

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


p-ISSN: 2614-6320

e-ISSN: 2614-6258

 Project by https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/project/ is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 Internasional License.


View My Stats