Model evaluasi kemampuan berpikir komputasi siswa SMP sebagai implementasi kurikulum merdeka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i2.27848Keywords:
Computational Thinking skill, Test Instrument Development, Kurikulum Merdeka, Junior High School StudentAbstract
Computational thinking is a skill that is required in the twenty-first century. Therefore, it is necessary to develop an instrument capable of objectively measuring computational thinking skills. The study aims to provide an evaluation model for computational thinking abilities in the form of a computational thinking test instrument for junior high school students. This study is a reasearch and development using the ADDIE method. However, this study is limited to the development stage. The developed instrument has undergone assessments for both content and construct validity. Additionally, construct validity is derived from both small and large group trials. These trials yield results regarding students responses, item validity, reliability, difficulty level, and item discrimination. This investigation generates findings. According to content validity, a valid test instrument has been developed with an Aiken V value of 0.81 (extremely high). Also, the student response questionnaire in the large-scale trial showed moderate findings. According to construct validity, there are 5 valid questions, a moderate reliability level, 6 questions with a tough level of difficulty, and 5 questions with low discrimination power. The construct validity results show that the questions are incompatible with the validity criteria, so they should be improved and tested again.
References
Agustiani, N., Setiani, A., & Lukman, H. S. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen tes PLSV berdasarkan indikator berpikir kritis dan pemecahan masalah. Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 107–119. http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jmathedu/article/view/15837. https://doi.org/10.34312/jmathedu.v3i2.15837
Amalia, K. F., Nurcahyono, N. A., & Lukman, H. S. (2025). Identifikasi kemampuan berpikir komputasi siswa SMP. Jurnal PEKA (Pendidikan Matematika), 8(2), 89–97. https://jurnal.ummi.ac.id/index.php/peka/article/view/3134/1328 . https://doi.org/10.37150/jp.v8i2.3134
Amalia, R., Fadilah, F., & Anwar, A. (2020). Development of appy pie learning media based on metacognitive approach for mathematical reflective thinking ability in geometry. 2019(July 2019), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.24071/seadr.2019.06
Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Maat, S. M. (2023). Student activities in solving mathematics problems with a computational thinking using Scratch. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 613–621. https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/23308 . https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23308
Astuti, A. W., Rahmawati, A. Y., & Richardo, R. (2021, July 17). Validitas isi instrumen tes berpikir komputasi matematika. Galuh Mathematics National Conference (GAMMA NC) 2021.
Avita, S., & Yahfizham, Y. (2024). Studi literatur : Analisis berpikir komputasi pada guru dan siswa dalam konteks implementasi kurikulum merdeka. Bilangan: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(3), 129–141. https://journal.arimsi.or.id/index.php/Bilangan/article/view/72 . https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v2i3.72
Aisy, A. R., & Hakim, D. L. (2023). Berpikir komputasi matematis siswa SMP pada materi pola bilangan. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 5(2), 348–360. https://ejournal.unma.ac.id/index.php/dm/article/view/6083/3443. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v5i2.6083
Azwar, S. (2012). Tes prestasi. Pustaka Pelajar.
Barcelos, T. S., & Silveira, I. F. (2012). Teaching computational thinking in initial series: an analysis of the confluence among mathematics and computer sciences in elementary education and its implications for higher education. 38th Latin America Conference on Informatics, CLEI 2012 - Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI.2012.6427135
Bower, M., Wood, L. N., Lai, J. W. M., Howe, C., & Lister, R. (2017). Improving the computational thinking pedagogical capabilities of school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(3), 53–72. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137876.pdf https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n3.4
Cahdriyana, R. A., & Richardo, R. (2020). Berpikir komputasi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. LITERASI, 11(1), 205–220. https://ejournal.almaata.ac.id/index.php/LITERASI/article/download/1290/1277/4685 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_13
Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. In Educational Researcher (Vol. 42, Issue 1, pp. 38–43). https://multimedia.uoc.edu/carlos/chipro/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/38.full_.pdf https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X1246305
Gunardi, A., Musta, R., & Harimu, L. (2022). Deskripsi kualitas butir soal ulangan akhir semester tahun ajaran 2019/2020 mata pelajaran kimia SMA Negeri 1 Wakorumba Selatan. SAINS Jurnal Ilmu Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia, 11(1). http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jpkime-mail:
Hanafi, M., Syamsuri, & Mutaqin, A. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen soal high order thinking skills matematika berdasarkan brookhart konteks motif batik pandeglang pada siswa MTs. Media Pendidikan Matematika Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA IKIP Mataram, 10(10). http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jmpm. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v10i1.5207
Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers and Education, 126, 296–310. https://sains.uho.ac.id/index.php/journal/article/view/25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004
Kamil, M. R. (2021). Analisis kemampuan berpikir komputasional matematis Siswa Kelas IX SMP Negeri 1 Cikampek pada materi pola bilangan. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2). https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/aksioma/article/view/8447/4577 . https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v12i2.8447
Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., & Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for computational thinking based on a systematic research review. Baltic J. Modern Computing, 4(3), 583–596. https://www.computacional.com.br/files/Geral/Kalelioglu%20-%20A%20Framework%20for%20Computational%20Thinking%20Based%20on%20a%20Systematic%20Research%20Review.pdf
Kallia, M., van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: a literature-informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104 https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104
Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, Dan Asesmen Pendidikan KementrianPendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran, Pub. L. No. 008/H/KR/2022 (2022).
Khairatunnisa. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka dalam proses pembelajaran bahasa berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2). https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jp/article/view/19916 https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v7n2.p94-99
Magdalena, I., Hifziyah, M., Aeni, V. N., & Rahayu, R. P. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen tes siswa tingkat sekolah dasar Kabupaten Tangerang. Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 227–237. https://ejournal.stitpn.ac.id/index.php/nusantara. https://doi.org/10.36088/nusantara.v2i2.808
Maharani, S., Kholid, M. N., Pradana, L. N., & Nusantara, T. (2019a). Problem solving in the context of computational thinking. Infinity Journal, 8(2), 109–116. https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/view/1082 https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v8i2.p109-116
Maksum, K., Afifah, N., Ardiyaningrum, M., & Sukati. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir komputasi pada pelajaran matematika sekolah dasar (SD) / Madrasah Ibtida’iyah (MI). MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 9(1). https://jurnal.stitnualhikmah.ac.id/index.php/modeling/article/view/1038 https://doi.org/10.69896/modeling.v9i1.1038
Marom, S. (2023). Berpikir komputasi di dalam kurikulum merdeka : analisis pada guru matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1). https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/aksioma/article/view/15269/6775. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v14i1.15269
Masitoh, L. F., & Aedi, W. G. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen higher order thinking skills (hots) matematika di SMP Kelas VII. Jurnal Cendikia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2). https://j-cup.org/index.php/cendekia/article/view/328. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v4i2.328
Mubarokah, H. R., Pambudi, D. S., Lestari, N. D. S., Kurniati, D., & Jatmiko, D. D. H. (2023). Kemampuan Berpikir Komputasi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Numerasi Tipe AKM Materi Pola Bilangan. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 343. https://jurnal.ugj.ac.id/index.php/JNPM/article/view/8013 https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v7i2.8013
Nordby, S. K., Bjerke, A. H., & Mifsud, L. (2022). Primary mathematics teachers’ understanding of computational thinking. KI - Kunstliche Intelligenz, 36(1), 35–46. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13218-021-00750-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00750-6
Pramesty, D. A., Novaliyosi, & Mustafa, A. N. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen tes literasi matematis model pisa dengan bernilai budaya banten untuk siswa kelas VII. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 17(2). https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/view/28452 . https://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v17i2.28452
Rusmining, & Nurnugroho, B. A. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes berdasarkan komponen proses literasi matematika. Histogram: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2), 106–115. https://journal.matappa.ac.id/index.php/histogram/article/view/1407 https://doi.org/10.31100/histogram.v5i2.1407
Sa’diyyah, F. N., Mania, S., & Suharti. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes untuk mengukur kemampuan berpikir komputasi siswa. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 4(1). https://journal.ikipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/jpmi/article/view/6356 https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v4i1.17-26
Safitri, T., Ginting, T. L. B., Indriani, W., & Siregar, R. (2024). Analisis kemampuan berpikir komputasi matematis siswa pada pembelajaran matematika. Bilangan : Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika, Kebumian Dan Angkasa, 2(2), 10–16. https://journal.arimsi.or.id/index.php/Bilangan/article/view/33 https://doi.org/10.62383/bilangan.v2i2.33
Shadish, William, R., Thomas, D. C., & Donald, T. C. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/132646/mod_resource/content/1/Estratto_ShadishCookCampbellExperimental2002.pdf
Sherly, Dharma, E., & Sihombing, H. B. (2020, July 21). Merdeka belajar : Kajian literatur. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pendidikan I.
Shonia, mawar I., Basih, M. A., & Wijayanti, D. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen tes penalaran aljabar berbasis taksonomi marzano pada materi program linier. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sultan Agung 2 (Sendiksa 2): “Belajar Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Di Era Digital,” 12.
Sugiono. (2019). Statistika untuk penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiono. (2021). Metode penelitian pendidikan (kuantitatif, kualitatif, kombinasi, r&d dan penelitian pendidikan) (A. Nuryanto, Ed.; 3rd ed.). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sung, W., & Black, J. B. (2020). Factors to consider when designing effective learning: Infusing computational thinking in mathematics to support thinking-doing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(4), 404–426. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15391523.2020.1784066 https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1784066
Supiarno, M. G., Sholikin, N. W., Harmonika, S., & Gaffar, A. (2022). Implementasi pembelajaran matematika realistik untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir komputasional siswa. Journal Numaracy, 9(1), 1–13. https://ejournal.bbg.ac.id/numeracy/article/view/1750/1347
Wahyudi, E. (2023). Pengembangan instrument tes berbasis asesmen kompetensi minimum materi trigonometri pembelajaran matematika kelas X SMA. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 12(1), 59. https://e-journal.unipma.ac.id/index.php/jipm/article/view/15075 https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v12i1.15075
Widiyono, A., & Millati, I. (2021). Peran teknologi pendidikan dalam perspektif merdeka belajar di era 4.0. Journal of Education and Teaching (JET), 2(1), 1–9. https://jet.or.id/index.php/jet/article/view/63. https://doi.org/10.51454/jet.v2i1.63
Wulandari, S., Hajidin, H., & Duskri, M. (2020). Pengembangan soal higher order thinking skills (hots) pada materi aljabar di sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika, 7(2), 200–220. https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/DM/article/view/17774 https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v7i2.17774
Zafrullah, Z., Gunawan, R. N., Ramadana, N., Era Mutiara, & Nur, M. I. (2024). Instrumen literasi numerasi berbasis kemampuan berpikir komputasi pada matematika smp: pembuktian validitas isi dengan aiken’s. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(5), 6177–6189. https://ejournal.indo-intellectual.id/index.php/imeij/article/view/1962 https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i5.1962
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 1600 times
Language
Akreditasi
Template
Addional Menu
Indexing
Recomended Tools
