Profil berpikir aljabar siswa SMA dalam menyelesaikan masalah ditinjau dari gaya kognitif

Authors

  • Muhammad Jamaluddin Univesitas Qomaruddin
  • Roisatun Nisa Universitas Qomaruddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i1.30759

Keywords:

Algebraic Thinking, Cognitive style, Linear equation

Abstract

Students’ algebraic thinking ability remains relatively low, while differences in Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) cognitive styles have not been extensively examined in the context of solving systems of linear equations in three variables at the senior high school level. This study aims to analyze students’ algebraic thinking characteristics in terms of FI and FD cognitive styles when solving problems involving systems of linear equations in three variables. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving two students, each representing FI and FD cognitive styles. Data were collected through an algebraic thinking test and semi-structured interviews, and analyzed based on indicators of modeling, generalization, abstraction, dynamic thinking, analytical thinking, and organization. The findings indicate that FI students tend to be more analytical and independent, demonstrating strong abilities in abstraction and generalization as well as efficient problem-solving strategies. In contrast, FD students exhibit more contextual and procedural thinking patterns, relying on external structures and visual representations. These findings underscore the importance of adaptive algebra instruction that accommodates students’ cognitive style differences, while also providing conceptual and pedagogical contributions to the design of adaptive algebra learning based on cognitive style variation.

References

Hardiansyah, F. et al. (2024) ‘Analysis of field dependent and field independent cognitive styles in solving science problems in elementary schools’, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(3), pp. 1159–1166.

Hardiansyah, F. (2024) ‘Analysis of mathematical problem-solving ability based on field dependent and field independent cognitive styles’, International Journal of Instruction, 17(1), pp. 233–248. doi: 10.29333/iji.2024.17113a.

Hasan, B. (2023) ‘Proses kognitif siswa Field Independent dan Field Dependent dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika’, Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(4), pp. 90–102. doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v3i4.p%25p.

Hasanah, M. and Masduki, M. (2024) ‘Exploration Of Computational Thinking Skills Of Junior High School Student In Term Of FI And FD Cognitive Style’, Mathline : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9, pp. 1119–1138. doi: 10.31943/mathline.v9i4.695.

Ismaimuza, D. and Lefrida, R. (2024) ‘Mathematical communication of vocational students with field dependent and independent cognitive styles in solving linear programming problems’, Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences, 51(8).

Ismayanti and al., et (2022) ‘Proses berpikir aljabar siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika’, Jurnal Education and Development, 10(3), pp. 598–602.

Kozhevnikov, M. (2021) ‘Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology: Toward an integrated framework’, Psychological Bulletin, 147(6), pp. 584–611. doi: 10.1037/bul0000332.

Mathematics, N. C. of T. of (2020) Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.

Permatasari, D. (2023) ‘Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam kegiatan transformasional berpikir aljabar’, Jurnal Gantang. doi: 10.31629/jg.v6i1.2523.

Radford, L. (2021) Algebraic thinking: Toward a theory. Springer.

Sibgatullin, I. R., Gorev, P. M. and Sakhieva, R. G. (2022) ‘A systematic review of algebraic thinking in mathematics education’, Education Sciences, 12(6), p. 401. doi: 10.3390/educsci12060401.

Sobirin, J., Setiawan, Y. and Faradiba, S. (2023) ‘Mathematical Representations Based on Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles’, JME (Journal of Mathematics Education), 8, pp. 137–149. doi: 10.31327/jme.v8i2.1981.

SÜNNETÇİ, Ç. and Ünal, H. (2025) From Problem Solving to Algebraic Thinking: The Power of Mathematical Modelling in Equations and Equalities. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7964404/v1.

Tinajero, C. and Páramo, M. F. (2022) ‘Field dependence–independence and academic achievement: A systematic review’, Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), pp. 1–32. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09617-1.

Witkin, H. A. et al. (1977) ‘Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications’, Review of educational research. Sage Publications Sage CA: Thousand Oaks, CA, 47(1), pp. 1–64.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 1022 times