A sequential error pattern in mathematical creative thinking: From concept to representation

Authors

  • B. Widya Melati Patricia Universitas Jambi
  • Duano Sapta Nusantara Universitas Jambi
  • Syamsir Sainuddin Universitas Jambi
  • Da Tien Nguyen Hanoi Metropolitan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i5.32607

Keywords:

Conceptual error, Education, Error Analysis, Mathematical creative thinking, Students

Abstract

This study analyzes the types and patterns of mathematical errors made by low-achieving students in solving mathematical creative thinking ability tasks. A qualitative descriptive approach with an error analysis method was employed. From 54 eighth-grade students at two public junior high schools in Jambi, who were randomly sampled for the MCTA test, 44 students were purposively selected as low-achieving. Data were collected through written tests, semi-structured interviews, and documentation. Only three of six error types were observed, namely Conceptual Error, Strategic Error, and Representation Error. CE was the most frequent type on every item, observed in 61.4% to 90.9% of the students, and SE and RE occurred mostly together with CE. Procedural, Symbolic, and Computational Errors were not observed. This pattern suggests that the work of low-achieving students stalled at the conceptual stage before procedural work began. The study offers a frequency-based account of how error types co-occur on creative tasks, which indicates that conceptual understanding is a foundational prerequisite for MCTA.

References

Benecke, K., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Teachers’ approaches to handling student errors in mathematics classes. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263231184642

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Delastri, L., & Lolang, E. (2023). Students’ conceptual error and procedural error in solving algebraic problems. Multicultural Education, 9(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7508092

Dorner, C., Ableitinger, C., & Krammer, G. (2025). Revealing the nature of mathematical procedural knowledge by analysing students’ deficiencies and errors. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2445666

Ersoy, E., & Kara, D. O. (2026). The effect of the creative problem solving approach on creative thinking skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1734855. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1734855

Ersoy, E., Kara, D. O., & Yucel, E. (2025). Unraveling the creative mathematical thinking of primary school children: A qualitative exploration. The Journal of Educational Research, 119(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2525247

Incikabi, S. (2025). Investigating middle school students’ creative problem solving in numerical and spatial domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1686498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1686498

Johar, R., Fauzan, A., Sugiman, S., Anwar, L., Sa’dijah, C., & Khairunnisak, C. (2025). Developing local instruction theory through ethnomathematics and technological based realistic mathematics education to support students’ spatial ability. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 4(4), 553–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263251383572

Jumariah, E., Sabil, H., & Junita, R. (2025). An analysis of students’ creative thinking errors in solving polyhedra problems. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 11(2), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.33474/jpm.v11i2.24683

Kenney, R., & Ntow, F. D. (2024). Unveiling the errors learners make when solving word problems involving algebraic task. SAGE Open, 14(4), Article 21582440241299245. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241299245

Kholid, M. N., Mahmudah, M. H., Ishartono, N., Putra, F. G., & Forthmann, B. (2024). Classification of students’ creative thinking for non-routine mathematical problems. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2394738. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2394738

Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta analysis of STEM project based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014

Lin, X., Riccomini, P. J., & Liang, X. (2025). Mathematical error patterns of students with mathematics difficulty: A systematic review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 48(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487241310873

Lusiana, R., Andari, T., Elvierayani, R. R., & Huda, S. (2025). Patterns of pre-service mathematics teachers’ scaffolding shaped by students’ error diagnosis. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(4), 1167–1192. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i4.pp1167-1192

Lusinda, U., Pasaribu, F. T., Gustiningsi, T., & Nusantara, D. S. (2025). Pengembangan soal matematika tipe PISA konten uncertainty and data menggunakan konteks Museum Siginjai Jambi. Numeracy, 12(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.46244/numeracy.v12i1.3128

Nguyen, D. T. (2025). Project-based learning (PjBL) as an experiential pedagogical methodology in interdisciplinary education: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 13(4), 1016–1039. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.4869

Nufus, H., Muhandaz, R., Hasanuddin, Nurdin, E., Ariawan, R., Fineldi, R. J., Hayati, I. R., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). Analyzing the students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in terms of self-regulated learning. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e24871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24871

Nurhayati, A., Prabawanto, S., & Novianingsih, K. (2026). Eksplorasi kesalahan siswa kelas X dalam menyelesaikan soal eksponen dan logaritma berdasarkan kategori Watson. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 9(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i1.29615

Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, Z., & Putri, R. I. I. (2025a). Investigating students’ mathematical argumentation ability in solving PISA like mathematics on change and relationships. Mathematics Education Journal, 19(4), 807–826. https://doi.org/10.22342/mej.v19i4.pp807-826

Nusantara, D. S., Ibarra, F. P., Pasaribu, F. T., & Lusinda, U. (2025b). Designing JUMPISA: A PISA based jumping task to support students’ statistical literacy using Jambi context. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 6(2), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v6i2.2518

Nusantara, D. S., Pasaribu, F. T., Gustiningsi, T., & Abdullah, A. H. (2025c). Developing mind mapping based pocketbook with augmented reality to support creative thinking skills in pre service mathematics teachers. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 9(2), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.35706/sjme.v9i2.204

Nusantara, D. S., Herlambang, S. B., Pasaribu, F. T., & Maphutha, K. (2026). Developing PISA-like task using climate change contexts to enhance students’ statistical literacy. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 11(2), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v11i2.15181

Rosyana, T., Juniati, D., & Khabibah, S. (2026). Eksplorasi berpikir kreatif siswa dalam pemecahan masalah matematika berbasis computational thinking. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 9(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i1.30720

Sainuddin, S., Subali, B., Jailani, & Elvira, M. (2022). The development and validation prospective mathematics teachers holistic assessment tools. Ingenierie Des Systemes d’Information, 27(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270201

Siregar, H. M. (2019). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal tes kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis materi lingkaran. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 497–507. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i3.2379

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44, Article 101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2025). Creative self efficacy, attitudes, creative style, and environmental literacy: Promoting mathematical creative thinking. The Journal of Educational Research, 118(5), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2025.2495329

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (2002). Number of person or item strata: (4*separation + 1)/3. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(3), 888. https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt163f.htm

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 5 (2026): JPMI

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 0 times
PDF - 0 times