Analisis prospektif pembelajaran konsep kesebangunan kelas VII SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v8i5.28605Kata Kunci:
hypothetical learning trajectory, learning obstacle, mathematics text book, mathematical learning, similarity in geometryAbstrak
This study aims to identify learning obstacles and develop a Hypothetical Learning Trajectory (HLT) for teaching the concept of similarity in Grade VII. The research is part of Didactical Design Research at the prospective analysis stage. Data were collected through textbook review, analysis of instructional materials, curriculum documents, diagnostic tests, and interviews with teachers and students. Analysis techniques include qualitative analysis, descriptive statistics, and data triangulation. Findings reveal types of learning obstacles: (1) ontogenetic, low conceptual readiness; (2) epistemological, inability to relate ratios to similarity conditions, compare corresponding sides, and make sketches; and (3) didactic, materials that lack explicit explanation of similarity conditions, offer few contextual activities, and focus on procedures. Based on these findings, the HLT includes three goals: informal recognition of similarity, identifying similar triangles based on conditions, and solving contextual problems through exploratory activities, group discussion, and real-life contexts. The study implies that systematic identification of learning obstacles is essential for designing more adaptive and meaningful instructional interventions.
Referensi
Aizid, R. (2018). Sejarah terlengkap peradaban dunia. Noktah.
Aji, L. J., Hendrawati, T., Febrianti, R., Wulandari, N. D., Gilaa, T., Abdullah, G., Rukmana, L., Rohman, T., Sahib, A., & Simal, R. (2024). Model-model pembelajaran dalam dunia pendidikan. Qriset Indonesia.
Alfiatin Ni’mah, Mita Putri Laksono, Muhammad Amaruddin Asy Syarif, Yun, S. A., Siti Miftakhul Jannah, Tomy Afandi, Virnada Saniata Lailal Chusna, & Idayati, W. (2025). Refleksi pembelajaran dalam kurikulum merdeka: Adaptasi dan implementasi untuk penguatan pendidikan. Jurnal IHSAN Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 3(2), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.61104/ihsan.v3i2.895
Artigue, M. (1994). Didactical engineering as a framework for the conception of teaching products. In Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline (Vol. 54, p. 481). Springer Nature Link. http://www.informaworld.com/index/713806883.pdf
Aspuri, & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Kemampuan koneksi matematis siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita: Studi kasus di SMP Negeri 3 Cibadak. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 7(2), 124–131. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v7i2.3651
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from examples: instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
Azzahra, I. F., Al Farel, M. R., & Rahmadhani, R. (2025). Kurikulum merdeka: Telaah potensi dan tantangan implementatif dalam mewujudkan pendidikan fleksibel di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia: Teori, Penelitian Dan Inovasi, 5(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.59818/jpi.v5i3.1530
Biber, A. Ç. (2020). Students’ difficulties in similar triangle questions. Cypriot Journal of Education Sciences, 15(5), 1146–1159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i5.5161
Brousseau, G. (2002). Theory of didactical situation in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Chazan, D. (1988). Similarity: Exploring the understanding of a geometric concept. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234583665_similarity_exploring_the_understanding_of_a_Geometric_Concept_Technical_Report_88-15
Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (D. A. Grouws (ed.)). Macmillan Publishing Company. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=N_wnDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA420&dq=Geometry+and+spatial+reasoning&ots=zl0DdtrF-N&sig=9iskqH53tytklSA28sAm7mZ0LYs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Geometry and spatial reasoning&f=false
De La Cruz, R. J., & Faßbender, H. (2016). On the diagonalizability of a matrix by a symplectic equivalence, similarity or congruence transformation. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 496, 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2016.01.030
Dennis, D., & Addington, S. (2009). Similarity , geometric arithmetic , and the geometric mean. https://www.quadrivium.info/MathInt/Notes/Sim%26GM.pdf
Depdiknas. (2006). Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional nomor 22 tahun 2006 tentang standar isi untuk satuan pendidikan dasar dan menengah.
Depdiknas. (2008). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan tentang buku nomor 2 tahun 2008 tentang buku.
Dündar, S., & Gündüz, N. (2017). Justification for the subject of congruence and similarity in the context of daily life and conceptual knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3256.35-54
Fauziah, N. I., & M.A., E. C. (2021). Students’ difficulties in solving ratios and proportional relationships problems. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Applied Engineering (AECon 2020), 229, 151–157. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-12-2020.2309147
Firdaus, A., & Mutaqin, A. (2019). Desain didaktis matematis problem solving pada konsep kesebangunan. GAUSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 02(01), 13–24. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30656/gauss.v2i1.1440
Frisnoiry, S., Situmorang, G. I., Purba, R. D., Ginting, C. Y. B., Panjaitan, J., & Najwa, A. (2024). Pengoptimalan pemahaman konsep matematika dengan pendekatan historis dalam pembelajaran matematika. SEPREN: Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 06(01), 78–85. https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v4i1
Fuadiah, N. F. (2015). Hypothetical learning trajectory dan peranannya dalam perencanaan pembelajaran matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, September, 382–387.
Fyfe, E. R., McNeil, N. M., Son, J. Y., & Goldstone, R. L. (2014). Concreteness fading in mathematics and science instruction: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9249-3
Gravemeijer, K., & Cobb, P. (2006). Design research from a learning design perspective. In Educational Design Research.
Haj-Yahya, A. (2022). Students’ conceptions of the definitions of congruent and similar triangles. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1902008
Hamzah, E., Yani, A. T., & Nursangaji, As. (2019). Analisis kesalahan konsep dalam menjawab soal-soal ada materi kesebangunan menggunakan certainty of response index. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 8(11), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v8i11.37595
Ikrom, F. D., Ningtias, D., Hafidoh, H., Suhernah, S., & Yusup, M. (2025). Studi literatur: Pengaruh penggunaan media visual terhadap motivasi belajar. Warta Dharmawangsa, 19(1), 425–442. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v19i1.5653
Islami, A. N., Rahmawati, N. K., & Kusuma, A. P. (2019). Analisis kesulitan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika pada materi kekongruenan dan kesebangunan. Simposium Nasional Ilmiah, 1, 158–170. https://doi.org/10.30998/simponi.v0i0.444
Jiang, T., & Li, S. (2023). Secondary school students’ use and perceptions of textbooks in mathematics learning: A large-scale investigation in china. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 01–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1132184
John Casey, & Euclid. (2007). The first six books of the elements of euclid. In Project Gutenberg eBook (Third edit). Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/21076/21076-pdf.pdf
Kemendikbudristek. (2022a). Capaian pembelajaran matematika fase D. https://guru.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum/referensi-penerapan/capaian-pembelajaran/mata-pelajaran/fase/?level=SD-SMA&subject=Matematika&phase=D&label=Matematika
Kemendikbudristek. (2022b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Mutu Buku, Standar Proses dan Kaidah Pemerolehan Naskah, serta Standar Proses dan Kaidah Penerbitan Buku.
Kemendikbudristek. (2024). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Pendidikan Dasar, dan Pendidikan Menengah (Edisi Revi). Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP).
Kuzle, A. (2021). Drawing out emotions in primary grade geometry: An analysis of participant-produced drawings of Grade 3-6 Students. Lumat, 9(1), 844–872. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1620
Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617132
Peng, C. (2021). The academic motivation and engagement of students in english as a foreign language classes: Does teacher praise matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12(778174), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174
Prediger, S. (2019). Theorizing in design research: methodological reflections on developing and connecting theory elements for language-responsive mathematics classrooms. Avances de Investigacion En Educacion Matematica, 15, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.265
Putri, T. N., Anwar, R. N., & Afifah, D. R. (2024). Manfaat modul ajar terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik. Seminar Nasional Sosial Sains, Pendidikan, Humaniora, (SENASSDRA), 3(3), 18–21. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/SENASSDRA
Ramadhan, S., Ihlas, Hendra, Muslim, Kusumawati, Y., Aulia, R., Ahmad, & Ferawaty. (2024). Pendidikan dan pembelajaran dalam kurikulum merdeka di sekolah dasar. K-Media.
Sibley, T. Q. (1998). The geometric viewpoint a survey of geometries. Addison Wesley Higber Mathematics.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.2.0114
Sugianto, S. D., Ahied, M., Hadi, W. P., & Wulandari, A. Y. R. (2018). Pengembangan modul ipa berbasis proyek terintegrasi stem pada materi tekanan. Natural Science Education Research, 1(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.21107/nser.v1i1.4171
Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical Design Research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 3–12.
Susanto, D., Sihombing, S., Radjawane, M. M., Wardani, A. K., Kurniawan, T., Candra, Y., & Mulyani, S. (2022). Matematika 2022 SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Pusat Perbukuan.
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory: Explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 37–56). Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
Sweller, J., Merrienboer, J. J. G. Van, & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022193728205
Syawahid, M. (2015). Kemampuan berfikir formal mahasiswa. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 8(2), 125–141.
Ubah, I., & Bansilal, S. (2019). The use of semiotic representations in reasoning about similar triangles in euclidean geometry. Pythagoras, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.V40I1.480
Wahyuningrum, A. S., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi. (2023). Students’ prior knowledge as an ontogenic obstacle on the topic of ratio and proportion. Mathematics Education Journal, 17(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.17.1.18866.55-68
Wardhaugh, B. (2021). Encounters with Euclid: How an ancient greek geometry text shaped the world. Princeton University Press.
Yenti, I. N., Fernando, E., & Afriyani, D. (2023). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal HOTS pada materi statistika. Prisma, 12(1), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v12i1.3034
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
