Penalaran dan komunikasi matematis: Tinjauan sistematis strategi efektif dalam mengembangkan kompetensi siswa

Penulis

  • Nur Fazria Adam Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Tedy Machmud Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Majid Majid Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v9i3.31440

Kata Kunci:

Mathematical reasoning, Communication skills, Teaching strategies, Student engagement, Realistic Mathematics Education

Abstrak

Mathematical reasoning and communication are essential competencies for students. This systematic review examines teaching strategies and methods that effectively enhance these competencies. This study employed a Systematic Literature Review  method following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Data were collected from the Scopus database using the keywords “Communication AND Mathematics AND Education AND Indonesia” for publications from 2016 to 2026. Of the 52 articles, 9 articles that met the inclusion criteria. This review highlights how traditional instructional approaches have evolved toward a greater emphasis on conceptual understanding and problem-solving. The main strategies discussed include Realistic Mathematics Education, Inquiry-Based Learning, collaborative learning, and technology integration. The review also explores the role of student engagement, demonstrating that active participation and intellectual involvement are key factors in developing these competencies. The findings indicate that contextual, interactive, and cognitively supported instruction is the most effective approach for fostering these competencies. The integration of reasoning and communication as interdependent competencies further emphasizes the importance of an integrated instructional approach.

Referensi

Atmojo, S. E., Lukitoaji, B. D., Rahmawati, R. D., Anggriani, M. D., & Anindya, A. P. (2025). Effects of hybrid STEM learning on 21st-century skills and character development in prospective elementary teachers: A mixed-methods study from Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(2), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n2a1716

Bodnaruc, A. M. (2024). Advances in systematic review reporting and methodological transparency. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(3), 215–228.

Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Student engagement in a flipped secondary mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1455–1480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10213-x

Hansen, E. K. S. (2022). Students’ agency, creative reasoning, and collaboration in mathematical problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00365-y

Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a theory of teaching mathematics with understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9084-6

Holst, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence and transparency in systematic review reporting. systematic reviews, 14(1), 1–12.

Kahale, L. A., Elkhoury, R., El Mikati, I. K., Pardo-Hernandez, H., & Schünemann, H. J. (2022). The evolution and use of prisma reporting guidelines in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 11(1), 1–11.

Khusnudin, M., & Bharata, H. (2022). Analysis of students' mathematical communication ability in completing mathematical modeling. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v6i2.2506

Lenz, K., Obersteiner, A., & Wittmann, G. (2024). Who benefits most from language-responsive learning materials in mathematics investigating differential effects in heterogeneous classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10321-9

Loviana, S., & Yunarti, T. (2024). Exploring the effect of problem based learning worksheets on students' mathematical communication. EMTEKA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24127/emteka.v6i2.8956

Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a context for promoting mathematical communication. mathematics teaching in the middle school, 5(5), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.5.5.0310

Munawwaroh, A. G., Pramudya, I., & Nurhasanah, F. (2024). Epistemological obstacles in the process ff learning mathematical abstraction: A systematic literature review. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v10i11.18749

Muryaningsih, S., Sugiman, & Kawuryan, S. P. (2026). Mapping trends and core topics in a decade of realistic mathematics education research: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(7), 2026437. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026437

Nurdiyana, A., & Pramuditya, S. A. (2025). Motivasi dan minat belajar sebagai prediktor kemampuan pemahaman matematis peserta didik berbasis quizizz. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 10(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.101.06

Nurniqta, Johar, R., Anwar, Ishak, M. I. S., & Oktavia, R. (2025). Integrating context in mathematics learning to enhance students’ mathematical communication skills and awareness of SDG 1: No poverty. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 19(3), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.19.3.609-628

Nursyahidah, F., Wardono, Mariani, S., & Wijayanti, K. (2025). Integrating technology, javanese ethnomathematics, and realistic mathematics education in supporting prospective mathematics teachers’ numeracy skills: a learning trajectory. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.671-688

Nurtamam, M. E., Budayasa, I. K., & Lukito, A. (2024). Process-oriented guided inquiry learning and students’ mathematical reasoning ability in Indonesia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 9(2), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v9i2.21308

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-

Wilson, E., McDonald, S., Moher, D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pérez-Neri, I. (2022). Reporting quality and transparency in systematic reviews: current perspectives. journal of clinical epidemiology, 145, 45–52.

Rahim, B., Andriani, C., Islami, S., Jasman, Efendi, F., & Adri, J. (2025). From classroom to industry: enhancing student competencies through steam-based project-based learning in fabrication and manufacturing technology. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(12), 2707–2717. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.12.2466

Ruslimin, A., Fuad, Y., & Masriyah. (2025). An analysis of students’ commognition with low working memory capacity in solving calculus problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 17, e2025374. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.17.374

Scells, H., Zuccon, G., Koopman, B., Deacon, A., & Azzopardi, L. (2022). Search strategy formulation for systematic reviews: issues, challenges and opportunities. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 15, 200091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200091

Siswantari. (2025). The role of realistic mathematics education principles in supporting students’ mathematical communication skills. Journal On Mathematics Education, 16(2), 729–752.

Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating mathematical discussions: from research to practice. Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2008(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675

Sun, Y. (2021). The Role of PRISMA in improving systematic review reporting quality. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(4), 455–462.

Triandini, E., Jayanatha, S., Indrawan, A., Putra, G. W., & Iswara, B. (2019). Metode systematic literature review untuk identifikasi platform dan metode pengembangan sistem informasi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Information Systems, 1(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v1i2.1916

Ubben, M. S., Kremer, F. E., Heinicke, S., Marohn, A., & Heusler, S. (2023). Smartphone usage in science education: a systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040345

Valenta, A., Rø, K., & Klock, S. I. (2024). A framework for reasoning in school mathematics: analyzing the development of Mathematical Claims. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 116, 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-024-10309-5

Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic mathematics education. in s. lerman (ed.), encyclopedia of mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 713–717). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170

Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640802701907

Zuckerman, D. (2015). student engagement in mathematics: the role of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(5), 749–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.976266.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-05-31

Terbitan

Vol 9 No 3 (2026): JPMI

Bagian

Articles

Lisensi

Creative Commons License

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.

Article Metrics

Abstrak view : 0 times
PDF (English) - 45 times