Pengajaran Bahasa Berbasis Tugas (Task-Based Language Teaching) Studi Kasus Guru Bahasa Inggris SMP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22460/jpp.v2i1.17404Keywords:
bahasa inggris, pengajaran bahasa berbasis tugas, sekolah menengah pertamaAbstract
Like many methodological innovations, Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) has been applied to many English curricula throughout Asia. However, little research has been conducted to explore what teachers know and believe about these method reforms in the specific context of their profession. This research originates from an in-depth study of teacher cognition in Junior High Schools in Tebo District, Indonesia using multi-methods of data collection. In this study, the findings will be reviewed and explained from one of the methods used to obtain teacher knowledge and attitudes towards narrative inquiry. In detail, teachers were asked to write reflective comments in Indonesian about their attitudes towards TBLT, and the experiences they had after implementing TBLT in class. After explaining some of the findings, the approach to data collection and the relevant context can be used as a reference for further research.
References
Barkhuizen, G., & Wette, R. (2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002
Bastani, K., Namavari, H., & Shaffer, J. (2019). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) for topic modeling of the CFPB consumer complaints. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.001
Bombak, A. E., Meadows, A., & Billette, J. (2019). Fat acceptance 101: Midwestern American women’s perspective on cultural body acceptance. Health Sociology Review, 28(2), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2019.1604150
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020). Academic Communities of Engagement: an expansive lens for examining support structures in blended and online learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 807–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360
Campbell, R., Goodman-Williams, R., & Javorka, M. (2019). A Trauma-Informed Approach to Sexual Violence Research Ethics and Open Science. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(23–24), 4765–4793. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519871530
Creswell, J. D., Welch, W. T., Taylor, S. E., Sherman, D. K., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mann, T. (2005). Affirmation of personal values buffers neuroendocrine and psychological stress responses. Psychological Science, 16(11), 846–851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01624.x
Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in Learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v10i430273
Fox, M. F. J., Werth, A., Hoehn, J. R., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2020). Teaching labs during a pandemic: Lessons from Spring 2020 and an outlook for the future. 1–24. http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.01271
Liu, C., & Tseng, M. Y. (2021). Paradigmatic variation in hedging and boosting: A comparative study of discussions in narrative inquiry and grounded theory research. English for Specific Purposes, 61, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.08.002
Mulyadi, D., Wijayatiningsih, T. D., Swaran Singh, C. K., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2021). Effects of technology enhanced task-based language teaching on learners’ listening comprehension and speaking performance. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14342a
Murray, Neil, Liddicoat, A. J., Zhen, G., & Mosavian, P. (2020). Constraints on innovation in English language teaching in hinterland regions of China. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820979855
Murray, Norman, Quataert, E., & Thompson, T. A. (2010). The disruption of giant molecular clouds by radiation pressure & the efficiency of star formation in galaxies. Astrophysical Journal, 709(1), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/191
Nam, H. (2023). Challenges and Constraints of Implementing Communicative Language Teaching: Teacher-Related vs. Non-Teacher-Related Factors. Journal, 16(1), 75–96. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index
Prilutskaya, M. (2021). Examining pedagogical translanguaging: A systematic review of the literature. Languages, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040180
Reich, J., Buttimer, C., Coleman, D., Colwell, R., Faruqi, F., & Larke, L. (2020). What’s lost, what’s left, what’s next: Lessons Learned from the Lived Experiences of Teaching during the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic. Teaching System Lab, 1–28. https://osf.io/2fjtc/.
Reitman, G., & Karge, B. D. (2019). Investing in Teacher Support Leads to Teacher Retention: Six Supports Administrators Should Consider for New Teachers. Multicultural Education, 27(1), 7–18.
Rissanen, I., Kuusisto, E., Tuominen, M., & Tirri, K. (2019). In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher’s classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.10.002
Roy, R., & Uekusa, S. (2020). Collaborative autoethnography: “self-reflection†as a timely alternative research approach during the global pandemic. Qualitative Research Journal, 20(4), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-06-2020-0054
Sato, M., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2019). “I think that is a better way to teach but …“: EFL teachers’ conflicting beliefs about grammar teaching. System, 84, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.06.005
Schill, C., Anderies, J. M., Lindahl, T., Folke, C., Polasky, S., Cárdenas, J. C., Crépin, A. S., Janssen, M. A., Norberg, J., & Schlüter, M. (2019). A more dynamic understanding of human behaviour for the Anthropocene. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0419-7
Shufutinsky, A. (2020). Employing use of self for transparency, rigor, trustworthiness, and credibility in qualitative organizational research methods. Organization Development Review, 52(1), 50–58.
Smith, J. (2019). Curriculum coherence and teachers’ decision-making in Scottish high school history syllabi. Curriculum Journal, 30(4), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1647861
Vaughn, M., Scales, R. Q., Stevens, E. Y., Kline, S., Barrett-Tatum, J., Van Wig, A., Yoder, K. K., & Wellman, D. (2021). Understanding literacy adoption policies across contexts: a multi-state examination of literacy curriculum decision-making. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(3), 333–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1683233
Vogt, K., Tsagari, D., & Spanoudis, G. (2020). What Do Teachers Think They Want? A Comparative Study of In-Service Language Teachers’ Beliefs on LAL Training Needs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 00(00), 386–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2020.1781128
Wood, L. M., Sebar, B., & Vecchio, N. (2020). Application of rigour and credibility in qualitative document analysis: Lessons learnt from a case study. Qualitative Report, 25(2), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4240
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Profesi Pendidikan (JPP)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
